tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-78269296550323075582024-03-05T03:55:40.082-08:00Nikon CLS and TTL/BL flashDesmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.comBlogger28125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-25304890838520084092010-10-19T00:03:00.001-07:002010-10-19T00:03:36.949-07:00Turbo flash<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This afternoon I decided to put the new "mutant" flash through its paces to see what it could do .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I fired it about 15-20 times all together without giving it much time to cool down .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I took a few shots to compare it to the SB800 on full power .Ignore the background getting brighter , it was raining and the sun was coming out again . Concentrate on the foreground and shadows .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I used the D50 because it can <a href="http://desmond-downs.blogspot.com/2010/07/flash-realsynch-flash.html">sync flash at any speed .</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhPfvXiElg_XBTwd5ZOCFo7bSx4dY3u6fgV9XxBWqrkU0fLkInAnJLCiQiT_IXPqW9o5KDuhJOiIDdNb-l3tkALRxUgynlPJSmjodxX-psbUxpx_Ll3BWFtxIm3M8G827Okuty_o4E2kxdP/s1600/asf+028.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhPfvXiElg_XBTwd5ZOCFo7bSx4dY3u6fgV9XxBWqrkU0fLkInAnJLCiQiT_IXPqW9o5KDuhJOiIDdNb-l3tkALRxUgynlPJSmjodxX-psbUxpx_Ll3BWFtxIm3M8G827Okuty_o4E2kxdP/s640/asf+028.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEheh24-GgnLd7BNdob1grJxv7-ecWC4SKi3dOUKb45COmApNhPvJCPFgbFdlY_-4p8Ae0JvxTghSf5_mdCFhRgeoZBMYcYM1DWSwvjx7o08CYIfpotlHW7koEfFxJXl_1g-EAQ2uBNQ-49-/s1600/asf+029.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEheh24-GgnLd7BNdob1grJxv7-ecWC4SKi3dOUKb45COmApNhPvJCPFgbFdlY_-4p8Ae0JvxTghSf5_mdCFhRgeoZBMYcYM1DWSwvjx7o08CYIfpotlHW7koEfFxJXl_1g-EAQ2uBNQ-49-/s640/asf+029.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I had the "super-flash" on half power which was half the capacitors in the original flash plus the 3500uf cap I added .<br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzvopkPQAL0NPRoBYjWG6LNN-PXLmmZ0Q6V0SJVF6Z-8j0MAisJ3GSmrZ_-AbOJKMVhDA_rGlo1KVi1BSsx6IgcRjXnIZ_ki60AnVlyb0C0Zytefyq5jXhmRnGZx1bk3W29aDPm5n_ejLc/s1600/asf+032.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzvopkPQAL0NPRoBYjWG6LNN-PXLmmZ0Q6V0SJVF6Z-8j0MAisJ3GSmrZ_-AbOJKMVhDA_rGlo1KVi1BSsx6IgcRjXnIZ_ki60AnVlyb0C0Zytefyq5jXhmRnGZx1bk3W29aDPm5n_ejLc/s640/asf+032.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Then I moved up the driveway to really put it to the test ....</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYSnzgdrojESf-Nfao3rcyjtGh5wHjVsgpvj-ysfWQ4UO5tIBxr-aRt7ApUKUSGxqMYzCwyjWeCSnWxmJrsHgmnX6Id6miC_WQSCinF1IdzqdM4iWIijs1jb9d6_sLmTuzcI2p7RfrSL-7/s1600/asf+040.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYSnzgdrojESf-Nfao3rcyjtGh5wHjVsgpvj-ysfWQ4UO5tIBxr-aRt7ApUKUSGxqMYzCwyjWeCSnWxmJrsHgmnX6Id6miC_WQSCinF1IdzqdM4iWIijs1jb9d6_sLmTuzcI2p7RfrSL-7/s640/asf+040.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgralhXDGmpG9uWFW1JnWBxCYiz-fxTaBwtXItQhoEHZTuOUf9-4JEk6QBv8bdjInKQgQsENGlM6Bstile06H-2SptcwfEA6Tea6bRk8WUYKzMMHU8RTtTBEQh4FzL0p90_PByDqsO00hUr/s1600/asf+041.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgralhXDGmpG9uWFW1JnWBxCYiz-fxTaBwtXItQhoEHZTuOUf9-4JEk6QBv8bdjInKQgQsENGlM6Bstile06H-2SptcwfEA6Tea6bRk8WUYKzMMHU8RTtTBEQh4FzL0p90_PByDqsO00hUr/s640/asf+041.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I then moved to the top of the driveway . And tried at 1/3200th sec .</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCEOkPK2VaPPVbvQIMkPAUkFz53f7S05qUak6Od1s6Mky0LDId9WoW6v6_bDtENpZ0a_QsflZ0pkGnyt87xFAmIDwCw8nZsbc2tiIr3LdYhyphenhyphen0GqYMXKxFJWHBFFkS0RFj9p4khbXE1Thub/s1600/asf+046.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCEOkPK2VaPPVbvQIMkPAUkFz53f7S05qUak6Od1s6Mky0LDId9WoW6v6_bDtENpZ0a_QsflZ0pkGnyt87xFAmIDwCw8nZsbc2tiIr3LdYhyphenhyphen0GqYMXKxFJWHBFFkS0RFj9p4khbXE1Thub/s640/asf+046.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEijBQLMqcyIZ38EpYwA7mCShZdPX3EgLyDm8AZYufbROXgKr8nPj3A2-bjHo-Um_vBQ_mwFO7KKAdYBZ31z3zkdUe5TAI9nssTdxtlJcECd1M2aQz17oyUekDD223DZINpAqzUzNmA0M0kw/s1600/asf+049.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEijBQLMqcyIZ38EpYwA7mCShZdPX3EgLyDm8AZYufbROXgKr8nPj3A2-bjHo-Um_vBQ_mwFO7KKAdYBZ31z3zkdUe5TAI9nssTdxtlJcECd1M2aQz17oyUekDD223DZINpAqzUzNmA0M0kw/s640/asf+049.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRydmAkk8beVzOuS6k5rDQ1PZrq29sQBVL6gViIOA3W01vz_iWlqq0DVLDNI6QuZGFymx2VUZcLpf_WLnJLLDrnzpkTgxYnbtgYlU_zIvbwQNoNwzCMZvDZKzHFnTYWtaU8AvTqLAYFDpc/s1600/asf+048.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRydmAkk8beVzOuS6k5rDQ1PZrq29sQBVL6gViIOA3W01vz_iWlqq0DVLDNI6QuZGFymx2VUZcLpf_WLnJLLDrnzpkTgxYnbtgYlU_zIvbwQNoNwzCMZvDZKzHFnTYWtaU8AvTqLAYFDpc/s640/asf+048.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I would imagine the flash tube will last as it doesn't appear to have suffered any side effects .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"Full power " is when the other half of the capacitor bank inside the flash handle is also connected. <br />
</span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-25614554176907254172010-10-02T19:55:00.000-07:002010-10-04T23:43:02.277-07:00Extending the SU800's "angle"<span style="font-size: large;"></span><span style="font-size: large;">For some this may be common knowledge but today I was doing some experiments with the SU800 outdoors .<br />
I had the SB800 on a stand behind me in remote mode firing at 1/128th power and kept changing the angle of the camera until it would no longer fire .<br />
When they were both pointing toward that fence it fired every time even with the flash behind the camera - maybe it was bouncing the signal off the fence ?<br />
Anyway I reached an angle when the SB800 would no longer fire ...</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBn03T8wqx2bjYZ0lhiE08LdNjtLMnSNsjXnZWKD2ycH5GVxOz4dL827RvPWah6Y23OdQg-gozCDdWoQVm_crpV0qXgcGc6nbDuH9vywTH7p3wj8LTnQaFvdtqdiKYGFzlugLC0pY5Kkj0/s1600/asu800bounce+002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBn03T8wqx2bjYZ0lhiE08LdNjtLMnSNsjXnZWKD2ycH5GVxOz4dL827RvPWah6Y23OdQg-gozCDdWoQVm_crpV0qXgcGc6nbDuH9vywTH7p3wj8LTnQaFvdtqdiKYGFzlugLC0pY5Kkj0/s640/asu800bounce+002.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
You kind of wonder why Nikon would make the trigger system facing directly forward which is the last place anyone would have their lighting .<br />
Then I added something to the equation , without moving anything , which made it fire again ....</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjtux_oIjY5cYEB5FxWvFxdhGAkRM8Q3P-8JqcViY4zYmfz_27t_MLMVjChyphenhyphenQHY5bCkj2Zp-f3vWSocByoomTV6T-FlnK7EKoAUM0DoHifgyrehIqGuIbH3rzytF2kGCF4vaLKvnnXlLUeo/s1600/asu800bounce+003.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjtux_oIjY5cYEB5FxWvFxdhGAkRM8Q3P-8JqcViY4zYmfz_27t_MLMVjChyphenhyphenQHY5bCkj2Zp-f3vWSocByoomTV6T-FlnK7EKoAUM0DoHifgyrehIqGuIbH3rzytF2kGCF4vaLKvnnXlLUeo/s640/asu800bounce+003.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
I had tried simply placing my finger in front of the SU800 and that worked , the signal bounced off my finger and triggered the flash behind the camera .<br />
I just added this little white object in front of the SU800 which bounced the signal backwards and made the flash fire every time .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/CLS/asu800bounce007.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/CLS/asu800bounce007.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
I see possibilities here , for the SU800 and SB800 , I think I could design something that attaches to each of them to send and receive signals from any angle - or at least increase their reliability in some situations .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">04/10/2010 </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I did some tests to see what range the SU800 has in bright sunlight with nothing to bounce off . I measured it out as 19 large steps .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJwpD6yD-Zy_ut0tMeiABPm3hQaMF7boLqMOdYSG18gZC_KcN-4A8bsebLjuFAkVSqJ5WWx7tJZv7tYQVMCtqmaFhEnPOaiM5eVQ4_Kro9rkYT49x-2St8zkRfSQ75OfnMRcWZAmg4BxcJ/s1600/arange+086.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJwpD6yD-Zy_ut0tMeiABPm3hQaMF7boLqMOdYSG18gZC_KcN-4A8bsebLjuFAkVSqJ5WWx7tJZv7tYQVMCtqmaFhEnPOaiM5eVQ4_Kro9rkYT49x-2St8zkRfSQ75OfnMRcWZAmg4BxcJ/s640/arange+086.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">When I turned around it would no longer trigger , understandably , but I found that placing a wide angle mirror in front of the SU800 would trigger the flash but the range was now down to 7 large steps .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYF3-SUbFkM35UlJplgEQIF3bVLSbpEPUrf-QsBNvHMlAf98qKjX7FlX6U9UgbSsCoL0BuvJJu84BVW9RS0XFh66eHLMaYyxQY5_Ns8YZQg2_dKPRUhowF9Kisa4YU0L3950Ofd9eCrzUa/s1600/arange+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="480" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYF3-SUbFkM35UlJplgEQIF3bVLSbpEPUrf-QsBNvHMlAf98qKjX7FlX6U9UgbSsCoL0BuvJJu84BVW9RS0XFh66eHLMaYyxQY5_Ns8YZQg2_dKPRUhowF9Kisa4YU0L3950Ofd9eCrzUa/s640/arange+001.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYUuVdk0IqQx-QKf8IORE_gfG86onnoyl-k7VChxxZJ7x3h2CilC4_K3IJCFc-m9rDvrFeB9vhbIJfZcsqWUvprab2fnHR5w8w55dijJoEvVscOTlBnp8RXVgCdoLErx-k1Lm2sGzJCYC8/s1600/arange+002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="480" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYUuVdk0IqQx-QKf8IORE_gfG86onnoyl-k7VChxxZJ7x3h2CilC4_K3IJCFc-m9rDvrFeB9vhbIJfZcsqWUvprab2fnHR5w8w55dijJoEvVscOTlBnp8RXVgCdoLErx-k1Lm2sGzJCYC8/s640/arange+002.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;">Not many people will ever need that range especially using flash outdoors but it's good to know what the limits are .<br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
.<br />
</span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-35528132505031997332010-09-25T00:58:00.000-07:002010-09-26T11:06:07.228-07:00Nikon wireless flash basics<span style="font-size: large;"></span><span style="font-size: large;">When working with multiple groups using Nikon's CLS system it helps to know the basics of how it meters .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">First we need to understand the limitations of the system .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The camera , or SU800 -whichever you use to command the remote flashes , doesn't know how many flashes are in each group . You could put 10 flashes in group A and the commander system you use wouldn't even know there was one there until it requested a pre-flash - Once it 'sees' the pre-flash reflected off the subject it knows there is at least one flash in group A and not much more .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This means that the flash output in each group is equal from all flashes in that group whether it's half power from one flash , 1/4 power from two flashes or 1/8th power from 4 flashes . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">One situation where this is useful to know is when when you have a flash behind the subject making it difficult for the metering system to work correctly .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Disregarding the under-exposure due to the white subject in this example , here is an image taken with one flash from the front left of the subject ..</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHdR7GqP0aWBH3OUeJIkDSUKWKe84Dy4UrBNivq_zYaPhFc7BuDGuPlE47SpatIHEvm5hi89gLw74JamzcgHcQsdcAaRf0Ty8WEs_csW8PdKMlGCydWeyviLzQyXiTdILoV_i0q9tPD5LF/s1600/zgroups+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHdR7GqP0aWBH3OUeJIkDSUKWKe84Dy4UrBNivq_zYaPhFc7BuDGuPlE47SpatIHEvm5hi89gLw74JamzcgHcQsdcAaRf0Ty8WEs_csW8PdKMlGCydWeyviLzQyXiTdILoV_i0q9tPD5LF/s640/zgroups+001.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The system has metered the pre-flash reading using the 'focus point diamond' in much the same way that Nikon's 3D matrix metering measures the ambient in normal photography . It 'maps out' an area , in this case the pre-flash reading , and determines that that is the subject and adjusts flash output accordingly .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjhqiZv1b79mTedP9GmcuY4pejWpYU5AZoqBysj6aIm9UFXH-lyR553nKutNTmN-lR-EwyRXM2d52rD3zO0SdAFBtzCZQ24EvyjckFw-sygvjtNQ972JxOog3U-gC79kiXWBuGfXt6xfPXZ/s1600/zzzgroups+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjhqiZv1b79mTedP9GmcuY4pejWpYU5AZoqBysj6aIm9UFXH-lyR553nKutNTmN-lR-EwyRXM2d52rD3zO0SdAFBtzCZQ24EvyjckFw-sygvjtNQ972JxOog3U-gC79kiXWBuGfXt6xfPXZ/s640/zzzgroups+001.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> Now see what happens when we move the one flash to an angle behind the subject ....</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgwbxGYIAHjlmP9ifpWIkEnFByJkb3t4CzEWidVeJJ-J6-K8LDN1s0xlowMRuGKbekTZdkhQSYRgi3up3QCPylPjQoquOIJ-1hfCjf2pCF9iU7r8qzl4v1KpELNQ0jSFHPAIwPnYhGRFUsC/s1600/zgroups+002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgwbxGYIAHjlmP9ifpWIkEnFByJkb3t4CzEWidVeJJ-J6-K8LDN1s0xlowMRuGKbekTZdkhQSYRgi3up3QCPylPjQoquOIJ-1hfCjf2pCF9iU7r8qzl4v1KpELNQ0jSFHPAIwPnYhGRFUsC/s640/zgroups+002.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Nikon TTL-BL , which is the metering mode that wireless CLS uses [Though it doesn't include distance info in its calculations with wireless CLS] unless you are in spot metering mode , is programmed to measure overly bright areas and disregard them from the equation classifying them as highly reflective surfaces . Understandably this is good for the system but also means that if you are using one flash behind the subject you will have very bright highlights as the system is not seeing the light in the direct line of the flash itself , rather it is getting readings from an angle and can only do so much in metering it correctly .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">It rejects the very bright spots and meters for the reasonably exposed areas .....</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLVcVGGpCPsie0aBcnBYHC6ODPuK9fyCKYNJ3c2xe2FUxyMivipndaCGa2xS-cYn7oT9RopWhqOJV58uOm4lJsMD0qr27_bKH0_ZQrgBCMYrwccceziqTJUuF6k0aposJn4crBUlhlKCIF/s1600/zzgroups+002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLVcVGGpCPsie0aBcnBYHC6ODPuK9fyCKYNJ3c2xe2FUxyMivipndaCGa2xS-cYn7oT9RopWhqOJV58uOm4lJsMD0qr27_bKH0_ZQrgBCMYrwccceziqTJUuF6k0aposJn4crBUlhlKCIF/s640/zzgroups+002.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh0QMaMwT25uDiF4E_Oh9jBrFKnUvlB4KGkQnPUdCw6gP8aQdnSQ8i1W70S_YGIkAJc6q7QkyncpJtw82uStNLo3iVqtPn4AIntTjD3BBuBvWtGVbTYUhTxBkl2RrFQcpZQp9dEaVjVYBCj/s1600/zzgroups+002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;">Now we put another flash in the front left , also in group A and see what happens ....</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTAoHhN9Vt14ZNN0hiMNY0JsrpZ7KwA7cMNyIaqC6WiUx54aus1PLIj3gvjeXxur3y8nSQ2IHP-Gg1gSq8wYxCih2ygw6_Vp7t5aDyVnsUeNacs2dppyLCogRMcejr-ayDc3V2vi_-l8h0/s1600/zgroups+003.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTAoHhN9Vt14ZNN0hiMNY0JsrpZ7KwA7cMNyIaqC6WiUx54aus1PLIj3gvjeXxur3y8nSQ2IHP-Gg1gSq8wYxCih2ygw6_Vp7t5aDyVnsUeNacs2dppyLCogRMcejr-ayDc3V2vi_-l8h0/s640/zgroups+003.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The system has measured the pre-flash that came from both flashes at the same time , without knowing there were two of them , disregarded the bright spot which it deems to be a highly reflective surface - which it is at that angle , and requested a flash output that gives it the 'correct' exposure on the rest of the metered area . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This gives a more accurate result with less blown highlights - it would be almost impossible not to have a small bright circle from the rear flash considering the angle of the flash and reflectivity of the subject's surface . </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgt-bFNaoJR4LEe2DrU1s9h88UeXa48t3r1kTI_erl9HtGVIyaGbwnzugqP6f5OI1CkhWfXrNoqJBMObouY_-bwnBu0h3epleXa4I-rFb1KrhnJdbgA1KZAanXTzjyd_7IKVBumCSZ2EUs1/s1600/zzgroups+003.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgt-bFNaoJR4LEe2DrU1s9h88UeXa48t3r1kTI_erl9HtGVIyaGbwnzugqP6f5OI1CkhWfXrNoqJBMObouY_-bwnBu0h3epleXa4I-rFb1KrhnJdbgA1KZAanXTzjyd_7IKVBumCSZ2EUs1/s640/zzgroups+003.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">What would happen if they were in separate groups ? Well the system would meter them independently and add their combined exposures on any common areas where both contribute and calculate an output to prevent over-exposure of any of the areas under the focus point diamond </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/TTLBL.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/TTLBL.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;">Like this ....</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrkjEL5Gt6tlnGHet4ifWJbQ4_mgxv6pZA0xDTfntJikN5hkiKIR7RDapm03DnEigfPLsVcoW8yCF20sUuXKJtFyp6c3J_s3_QLg0377uABWGZYhK_WhZfk19miPd9fQNt8CgAt5nRo9pX/s1600/zzgroups+004.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="425" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrkjEL5Gt6tlnGHet4ifWJbQ4_mgxv6pZA0xDTfntJikN5hkiKIR7RDapm03DnEigfPLsVcoW8yCF20sUuXKJtFyp6c3J_s3_QLg0377uABWGZYhK_WhZfk19miPd9fQNt8CgAt5nRo9pX/s640/zzgroups+004.jpg" width="640" /></a></span><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The system now knows that there is more than one flash because when it requested a pre-flash , in sequence from each group , it got one from group A and one from group B . The reading it got from group B was mostly disregarded due to the bright reflection that it detected resulting in an excessive exposure on one side and a 'correct' exposure in the front of the image using the readings from A and the small amount from B on that area , combined .</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaZcHOCZF-OalWEJt8DghVBKsHjrYu7jTkcjAM1m59Er510IF_fDoYS5zWH4NhK8r-pnrXXfC8bbLsovzpkoQY6CxC9Vu3KsWHmpCURdX6o9vN4kpUTKrFxGZUbpJTbWdIs5zgsGB5hm3S/s1600/zgroups+004.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="425" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaZcHOCZF-OalWEJt8DghVBKsHjrYu7jTkcjAM1m59Er510IF_fDoYS5zWH4NhK8r-pnrXXfC8bbLsovzpkoQY6CxC9Vu3KsWHmpCURdX6o9vN4kpUTKrFxGZUbpJTbWdIs5zgsGB5hm3S/s640/zgroups+004.jpg" width="640" /></a></span><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">What I get from these results is a clue as to controlling a light from behind the subject- by placing it in the same group as the front light and adjusting distance from the subject to vary its brightness , since it will be the same output as the front light , we can be confident that it will never be brighter than the front light - since they fire at an equal output .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The more complicated option is to use exposure compensation for a separate group or use manual settings for that group . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-77853931935838744802010-09-20T02:09:00.000-07:002018-05-30T12:04:03.951-07:00Moving the focus point can affect flash output !<span style="font-size: large;">Update: This issue has been fixed with the newer bodies as I found while doing the same test with the D7200, the difference being that with the D7200 the meter changes once the flash is turned on unlike the D90. This is the result I got in June 2016. The D7200 did not do this.</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbBVHnhqDIV-R8WRryVThyjaZ1NnF5g_-owFHcWPbOQhfyiAYnYSnAqbzmDyDQEt_tszAM_ZPhp-0kJJy8GuUz4mQBnm5enK8cI-sWthgrWw7bnoSD8E6RE3JLkIQqtM-bsqjEB51MK4z1/s1600/D90focuspoint.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbBVHnhqDIV-R8WRryVThyjaZ1NnF5g_-owFHcWPbOQhfyiAYnYSnAqbzmDyDQEt_tszAM_ZPhp-0kJJy8GuUz4mQBnm5enK8cI-sWthgrWw7bnoSD8E6RE3JLkIQqtM-bsqjEB51MK4z1/s640/D90focuspoint.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">First off : This is not a big cause for concern when using TTL-BL or wireless CLS , it is just an exercise in understanding how TTL-BL 'thinks' and very hard to duplicate in a test scene let alone have the possibility of it happening during normal photography :) .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I decided to 'correct' <a href="http://nikonclspracticalguide.blogspot.com/2009/10/does-moving-focus-points-affect-flash.html">an incorrect blog </a>on the subject . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I'll just emphasize here that the flash does not meter off the selected focus point , the change has nothing to do with the way the flash system meters .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This will also only happen in TTL-BL mode and with Nikon's CLS wireless flash which also meters in TTL-BL mode . The possibility of it happening falls within a very small window of the metering system - when the meter detects under-exposure causing the flash system to compensate by increasing output , or conversely by decreasing output if it detects that the exposure is suddenly correct after it showing as being under-exposed .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The possibility of this happening when a focus point is moved also depends heavily on the metering mode selected [ it must be matrix metering ] and how matrix metering works in that particular body - because it varies between models .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I used the Nikon D90 in these tests , I've tested the matrix metering system before and understand [ to a degree] how it 'thinks' .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">In many of the Nikon's [ not too sure about Canon ] matrix metering is strongly weighted toward the selected focus point and the 'focus plane' that it sits on , and it adjusts exposure accordingly . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This means that if you are photographing a landscape and move the focus point from bright sky to shadow area "in the same frame" your exposure could vary by as much as two stops without even moving the camera .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Now it has been suggested that the changes seen in flash output are not due to the metering but rather due to the change in distance info from the lens which affect the output of TTL-BL flash [ not wireless which doesn't use the distance info ] .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This will cause changes as well but not the type I am demonstrating here . I have selected a scene in which the darker object which causes the an increase in output , is actually closer than the lighter object proving that the change in this case is not related to distance info from the lens .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Here is my test scene , the back of a camera closer to the camera with a white multi-plug adapter further back . </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGNiMQpnA4rQ_8ffyvK9Ng_N9e1yhJ0y3YIldrF116yVCIt56GmyGAHRwm5FMkG3lWLIThvkXXN4-GcK_DeXAxMUyv3j1P710Fy9RiIeR5hqoulYurkIvreQHy6RXT6S46rfp0Og-DcTt0/s1600/zlcd+036.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGNiMQpnA4rQ_8ffyvK9Ng_N9e1yhJ0y3YIldrF116yVCIt56GmyGAHRwm5FMkG3lWLIThvkXXN4-GcK_DeXAxMUyv3j1P710Fy9RiIeR5hqoulYurkIvreQHy6RXT6S46rfp0Og-DcTt0/s640/zlcd+036.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Theoretically when I change the focus point from the white object to the black object closer to the camera the flash exposure should decrease as the lens registers a closer focus point .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">First I take a picture with the focus point moved onto the white object :</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5F8d3oxgi8EEFy5FS7mObqSeXFPJherlJowqbI0Ux2MzToHbuNFGSNHcGQsEzvfQ9ZsCphpx2ttBwA0FkxrMBkj4iBQPzPFEVZp1HqCtGnMTKpd5f5hQ3I6lHABbwsYITISyAd0UId2AU/s1600/zlcd+039.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5F8d3oxgi8EEFy5FS7mObqSeXFPJherlJowqbI0Ux2MzToHbuNFGSNHcGQsEzvfQ9ZsCphpx2ttBwA0FkxrMBkj4iBQPzPFEVZp1HqCtGnMTKpd5f5hQ3I6lHABbwsYITISyAd0UId2AU/s640/zlcd+039.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Then I move it onto the black object closer to the camera .... the flash exposure increases !?!</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhIxOOrSz0E-cT5BHKsCnrEQlO52r6obJbps4STs2BUJuwWJHsdSRaAufpLc8tKVcY7B-KPqrCsQ8_QSDu_qcwRfTvM6qToTf8dn_wtPTeNNxgKKX7iBl3SdUOm8JDO0QEFCu2Mb4c5_eWa/s1600/zlcd+038.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhIxOOrSz0E-cT5BHKsCnrEQlO52r6obJbps4STs2BUJuwWJHsdSRaAufpLc8tKVcY7B-KPqrCsQ8_QSDu_qcwRfTvM6qToTf8dn_wtPTeNNxgKKX7iBl3SdUOm8JDO0QEFCu2Mb4c5_eWa/s640/zlcd+038.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Why did that happen ?</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Well TTL-BL and wireless CLS 'watch your meter" and adjust output accordingly .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Here's the back of the screen in the first shot : </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The camera's meter was happy with the exposure with the focus point on the white object - that 'focus plane' decided that the camera's settings were correct for the scene so the camera told the flash to back off accordingly . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNjAeveCqwDhIgSmHXvExgFCSYmiyN-KVNKs7AgXFLbpb2vNM-qDTPFSastf3ahoEojqGWVzKPd6vnfPQxB9g5Hq4YxicwDM9g-EiyAJPHeA2Ot7LMl0LP9bCzpu-n_pfpTqXTe2XJZpkH/s1600/zlcd+026.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNjAeveCqwDhIgSmHXvExgFCSYmiyN-KVNKs7AgXFLbpb2vNM-qDTPFSastf3ahoEojqGWVzKPd6vnfPQxB9g5Hq4YxicwDM9g-EiyAJPHeA2Ot7LMl0LP9bCzpu-n_pfpTqXTe2XJZpkH/s640/zlcd+026.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">After taking the picture I simply moved the focus point onto the black object closer to the camera , which should have backed off the flash according to the distance info , but when the 'focus plane' shifted and the white object was no longer a dominant part of matrix metering's equation it decided that the image was under-exposed and the meter moved to "-1"</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">No camera settings were changed , the focus point was simply moved .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVI2j6miNO4SAXd3eHX-u9UiIMnM4FYkxG2vNU8_D8M9M8f0RX24Bd80yDUbp3OCF6v0xN1lgM2I57TfnwegbkGy1Jg5s3rNWYaeG54L9dhLfDk4gk-zRsYxz6KXtxFdkUKLHasm31WrJ3/s1600/zlcd+027.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVI2j6miNO4SAXd3eHX-u9UiIMnM4FYkxG2vNU8_D8M9M8f0RX24Bd80yDUbp3OCF6v0xN1lgM2I57TfnwegbkGy1Jg5s3rNWYaeG54L9dhLfDk4gk-zRsYxz6KXtxFdkUKLHasm31WrJ3/s640/zlcd+027.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">The flash output was increased because matrix metering decided that the scene , for that focus point , was under-exposed and so it decided to increase the flash output accordingly !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">So this proves that regardless of the changes caused by the distance information from the lens , there are isolated instances where flash output can be affected by moving the focus point in the same scene with no other changes to the camera's settings :) .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-30841154752021218592010-04-26T02:30:00.000-07:002010-04-26T02:30:23.422-07:00The SB26 vs SB800 "SU-4" comparisonI recently did a few tests with my newly acquired SB26 and the SB800 wireless flash modes using direct flash as a trigger <a href="http://desmond-downs.blogspot.com/2010/04/flash-su4-wireless-trigger-working.html">on my other blog</a> .Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-14201129249769844472010-04-03T23:40:00.000-07:002010-09-21T01:35:14.542-07:00TTL/BL increase in exposure with diffuser dome .<span style="font-size: large;"></span><span style="font-size: large;">The manual suggests using the diffuser dome at 60 degrees for bounce flash .I have found that generally TTL/BL and wireless CLS under-exposes with bounce flash with white objects .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I noticed recently in some tests using the diffuser dome [ which I seldom use ] that the exposure seems to increase when it is used .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">With plain TTL flash there seems to be a slight increase in exposure when the diffuser dome is on , possibly something to do with reflectivity and the way the metering pattern of TTL works .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1ibzdoVT0Vg9kRDGSjIWizTBbYOJ0HDX_XejkcDzqc_s1Eq-vlaVQt2DWsOQGiU5bVL4PLspmxVN4wKqoRnro7Rle9sfNHNRF1nbryBvj4072twEvks0Hcz-DqRN1QIJc_fcR73jzjjzb/s1600/zttldome+010.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1ibzdoVT0Vg9kRDGSjIWizTBbYOJ0HDX_XejkcDzqc_s1Eq-vlaVQt2DWsOQGiU5bVL4PLspmxVN4wKqoRnro7Rle9sfNHNRF1nbryBvj4072twEvks0Hcz-DqRN1QIJc_fcR73jzjjzb/s640/zttldome+010.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEga6FF-F30JbT4E-Q3EsF5qj-7EnrYpZL1KIZv5khEgyBpFjQcTra1NSUv5NP-f4dXZIkMxawcbxbAU0ko_WSMiMNrVWxgohXbwN2FcepSJgQfWmIY6kxfCMcKiULRFsNgMOgwACjgWlkF-/s1600/zttldome+011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEga6FF-F30JbT4E-Q3EsF5qj-7EnrYpZL1KIZv5khEgyBpFjQcTra1NSUv5NP-f4dXZIkMxawcbxbAU0ko_WSMiMNrVWxgohXbwN2FcepSJgQfWmIY6kxfCMcKiULRFsNgMOgwACjgWlkF-/s640/zttldome+011.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">With TTL/BL though the change is a lot more pronounced .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvgnWbrHsH9bEaL_4cCVm8abz3WZJgeVWOzF2VnpJFi6YBSTcOe6SMRW1uxIbunlqP-1SlLwFzw-OCMBC11EWEJufoZ6rvR5MVjszbSRjA-9fzRE6XkLm9kwjJRqpDQeiZbLRYc0u-_XFr/s1600/zBLdome+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvgnWbrHsH9bEaL_4cCVm8abz3WZJgeVWOzF2VnpJFi6YBSTcOe6SMRW1uxIbunlqP-1SlLwFzw-OCMBC11EWEJufoZ6rvR5MVjszbSRjA-9fzRE6XkLm9kwjJRqpDQeiZbLRYc0u-_XFr/s640/zBLdome+001.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">There's a slight increase in exposure when the wide angle diffuser is pulled out and the flash head pulls back to wide angle inside .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDr14oLvF_1ry7DB4Y2V7dAbSnAEsV9y-u9NVUs7kCN3LDeedZcCazwQ0EFiME6QDETbriHldQSJ9221l9QDPqZX_ur1InbqQm8egBYrg7hvMYQ9raOoEMWmZr3JmS3VjUt3k5vtWvNwIJ/s1600/zBLdome+002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDr14oLvF_1ry7DB4Y2V7dAbSnAEsV9y-u9NVUs7kCN3LDeedZcCazwQ0EFiME6QDETbriHldQSJ9221l9QDPqZX_ur1InbqQm8egBYrg7hvMYQ9raOoEMWmZr3JmS3VjUt3k5vtWvNwIJ/s640/zBLdome+002.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Then there is another slight increase when the diffuser dome is fitted .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYZ-JyxE4SFUhWsAlFfRlFSCT0WAC4xnQKu6aYClb4wgGclsfpzHQBE0q-H8k-EczrDpAd1tw0ZyQ6hYE9j6EAR7dowAqiRz2Jtk72bK0CbvZ9Tt5xObNeigMgyIzcZsawLZnsORejiQ6q/s1600/zBLdome+003.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYZ-JyxE4SFUhWsAlFfRlFSCT0WAC4xnQKu6aYClb4wgGclsfpzHQBE0q-H8k-EczrDpAd1tw0ZyQ6hYE9j6EAR7dowAqiRz2Jtk72bK0CbvZ9Tt5xObNeigMgyIzcZsawLZnsORejiQ6q/s640/zBLdome+003.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Now when you fit the diffuser dome there is a small button under the flash head that gets pressed in . Watch what happens when I simply press that button ...... the flash head zooms back and BAM !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7Ot7DvSMCaT1aB5GcP_tfqwOduuNOJqN1Hx8a_Y-Mj1LQKDudGK5zQ9qNFZRHK2fe9A-nqC5o-FqaQt0Ov9uFguv1jIT9ANgipZESSin_OT-vaXctSMoMOIC-UfwfX1FJ2ieyRbwiftCN/s1600/zBLdome+004.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7Ot7DvSMCaT1aB5GcP_tfqwOduuNOJqN1Hx8a_Y-Mj1LQKDudGK5zQ9qNFZRHK2fe9A-nqC5o-FqaQt0Ov9uFguv1jIT9ANgipZESSin_OT-vaXctSMoMOIC-UfwfX1FJ2ieyRbwiftCN/s640/zBLdome+004.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">To get the same increase in exposure with direct flash I had to dial in an extra two stops of compensation .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">So there is something in the TTL/BL program that responds to that button , besides the fact that the flash head zooms back to its widest setting it also seems to increase its output excessively disregarding the pre-flash reading .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Another possible concept is that when it expects a wide flash output and more diffused light perhaps the program that detects reflections and disregards them from the pre-flash reading starts to allow for wider areas of reflection resulting in over-exposure as it starts reading more from the darker areas . [ these are all just theories for now ] .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Now in the past I have noted that TTL/BL under-exposes quite badly with white objects and bounce flash but this increase in output seems to counter-act that under-exposure if you remember to either use the diffuser dome or the wide angle diffuser - both of which increase the output .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The manual for the SB800 [ page 101 ] states that best results are achieved when the flash head is at 60 degrees with the diffuser dome on [ depending on the situation of course ] , perhaps they have calculated their over and under exposure and the amount of light the dome throws forward at this setting ?</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Either way I tried the same subject with bounce flash ......</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">And of course we have the usual over-reaction to whites that TTL/BL displays with bounce flash . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnbGpu2Cm438xKlRp7z3C_qjaklYyBiSw8rgOReBsYoBuhBGbRdu3G4FPanC1l-KwIuuj3wFAYImQFLnvZbpmc__ttU2I5Wu5R9H2xYXd9VqWcyM0rJuxuhetPTWaRz2a5101N5ckDx-QX/s1600/z60deg+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnbGpu2Cm438xKlRp7z3C_qjaklYyBiSw8rgOReBsYoBuhBGbRdu3G4FPanC1l-KwIuuj3wFAYImQFLnvZbpmc__ttU2I5Wu5R9H2xYXd9VqWcyM0rJuxuhetPTWaRz2a5101N5ckDx-QX/s640/z60deg+001.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Then we fit the diffuser dome .... much better !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5CRFq_9KBYBbBW-HrzcYGEpYTGp1aCn9tmiPhO7v0selaQmZKrUuc-AeR8ljnAX3TiF9AYzfyKfJEy4_FWac16ns7J3HqTN98AVr6nReixHes_LcroiF3fQUot0Iiok85iYaaMLEKX70p/s1600/z60deg+002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5CRFq_9KBYBbBW-HrzcYGEpYTGp1aCn9tmiPhO7v0selaQmZKrUuc-AeR8ljnAX3TiF9AYzfyKfJEy4_FWac16ns7J3HqTN98AVr6nReixHes_LcroiF3fQUot0Iiok85iYaaMLEKX70p/s640/z60deg+002.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">And once again either pulling out the wide diffuser or simply pressing the button under the flash head that the diffuser dome switches still gives us a favourable increase in exposure ...</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinBA4bsn7GnQv_SmLT5Hs6r8dnOlSr-L2lWoHOz47O8Uxdq1KorIOwkCbR7qmY1jgyzmpBi5ihl0oWkCIQ4SQf4YWrAG4KlLU7nGo4Hhcy2NPLZqaMCSmEUizoT5Y4CeRpaAzmjYU0JKr8/s1600/z60deg+003.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinBA4bsn7GnQv_SmLT5Hs6r8dnOlSr-L2lWoHOz47O8Uxdq1KorIOwkCbR7qmY1jgyzmpBi5ihl0oWkCIQ4SQf4YWrAG4KlLU7nGo4Hhcy2NPLZqaMCSmEUizoT5Y4CeRpaAzmjYU0JKr8/s640/z60deg+003.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">So my thoughts for now are that if you use bounce flash then either have the wide diffuser out , or the diffuser dome , or be prepared to dial in positive flash exposure compensation with 'normal ' bounce flash .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I was also requested on a forum to post a picture of the room .....</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhN8KxkB6i3ihzeBMyvLAK_4cSnFvXeOKXU3bLqbbkHIJSOiJIbvm8Eofj03kRG9rEJRGcxYWxe5kU7J8n1-YyoefZg5AUwHLs96Hz9J88zpEe3zKmWS_TK4IsudwLlbLyEWLBgFUwl2liG/s1600/zroom+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhN8KxkB6i3ihzeBMyvLAK_4cSnFvXeOKXU3bLqbbkHIJSOiJIbvm8Eofj03kRG9rEJRGcxYWxe5kU7J8n1-YyoefZg5AUwHLs96Hz9J88zpEe3zKmWS_TK4IsudwLlbLyEWLBgFUwl2liG/s640/zroom+001.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Update : some tests with bounce flash and distance info ...</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">When you use plain bounce flash with no modifiers the TTL/BL program "almost" ignores the distance info - we'll call it a 95% pre-flash reading and a 5% distance reading calculation just to make it easier to explain .</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The pre-flash reading identifies the white ball as the subject and responds by aiming for a neutral gray output .</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEig9vPJE-eX8qKRax8TZrRT3dQ07OiMnSefo0tyKodv-JlXaneDyUakq31jbhi8LqBz8Bb_DzOl0Fa5RzEUyplO2nLJ4448GzgM-vW2HvVdn5cz6Lq7Z43WB2uPbBK6Sg6m4W98K-PJpXJ1/s1600/zdist+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEig9vPJE-eX8qKRax8TZrRT3dQ07OiMnSefo0tyKodv-JlXaneDyUakq31jbhi8LqBz8Bb_DzOl0Fa5RzEUyplO2nLJ4448GzgM-vW2HvVdn5cz6Lq7Z43WB2uPbBK6Sg6m4W98K-PJpXJ1/s640/zdist+001.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Changing the focus and obviously the distance information from the lens has a very small effect on the exposure .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitYH3L_WcMuaRsAfxPBZ4bOcdQvBXkYrXj85weoR3DmEyFNcR1OBOZGPOLvKPcCFjuehovMnlbLasFLPZNm7FggAP5-H-_VUBWpysBznRXOKQkqxfUnrhGO7a9fwEBc_GTvXHUdsFTyO3w/s1600/zdist+002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitYH3L_WcMuaRsAfxPBZ4bOcdQvBXkYrXj85weoR3DmEyFNcR1OBOZGPOLvKPcCFjuehovMnlbLasFLPZNm7FggAP5-H-_VUBWpysBznRXOKQkqxfUnrhGO7a9fwEBc_GTvXHUdsFTyO3w/s640/zdist+002.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYGg3n27wPju8zlHKIHIdVS3kiMJedBvf6LYjwoPETdohMecEnk82nTx5AHbBhQzHGxVanrMgvLGdCjC_-Bh0ymVcmOFn91ew-uAvZ5SrsvXrYb3FOkuIzIrxp6oMCcgYzVb5Yd4Wr9mbH/s1600/zdist+003.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYGg3n27wPju8zlHKIHIdVS3kiMJedBvf6LYjwoPETdohMecEnk82nTx5AHbBhQzHGxVanrMgvLGdCjC_-Bh0ymVcmOFn91ew-uAvZ5SrsvXrYb3FOkuIzIrxp6oMCcgYzVb5Yd4Wr9mbH/s640/zdist+003.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">As soon as the diffuser dome is added or the wide diffuser is pulled out [ Just in case the program assumes that the bounce card will be used I left it extended ] the distance info affects the output to a larger degree and this shows in the change in focus [ and the resulting change in distance info ] .</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhELJx4hUW3Yi03ohKV7MvJWeXui3q8D6UY-b6YLYmhzLAimIC5kPllWSE2sHSm5AgZqaXs144E6W7S7rw_G432YE7kbNWY8Vldl7UBhzAIyvHLY7bMm-F3ToMgBKiWvrCJRs9Cgra0eag/s1600/zdist+004.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhELJx4hUW3Yi03ohKV7MvJWeXui3q8D6UY-b6YLYmhzLAimIC5kPllWSE2sHSm5AgZqaXs144E6W7S7rw_G432YE7kbNWY8Vldl7UBhzAIyvHLY7bMm-F3ToMgBKiWvrCJRs9Cgra0eag/s640/zdist+004.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEidtgBR2qNLtHJ1AXcw8kQuUfvH0PxoIuFQV7jOMQvZM7sQeibRPWFeBXHCC8oiAjrOm67nbL-o1Z9vob_dPBCoE1O57afrJOCHstK_2nkhAEtIL4UowqrZHzqxV4jT_RPrwE2QROkHpg-b/s1600/zdist+005.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEidtgBR2qNLtHJ1AXcw8kQuUfvH0PxoIuFQV7jOMQvZM7sQeibRPWFeBXHCC8oiAjrOm67nbL-o1Z9vob_dPBCoE1O57afrJOCHstK_2nkhAEtIL4UowqrZHzqxV4jT_RPrwE2QROkHpg-b/s640/zdist+005.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">It's starting to look more like a 50/50 equation now with regard to input from the pre-flash reading and the distance info . </span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiY_kaYxbYBt3OlqWw3htOHTqNuOpB02BU6jPyB9ub39LcHdQBDX8lZD-T7BJvlqZAOxnP17C3zwfsA1NFzciTwxvj1EQiiTxndcgHyMlB4i277zIdeAIJ-drArsFedlLlFVBLiuwo9q-IP/s1600/zdist+006.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiY_kaYxbYBt3OlqWw3htOHTqNuOpB02BU6jPyB9ub39LcHdQBDX8lZD-T7BJvlqZAOxnP17C3zwfsA1NFzciTwxvj1EQiiTxndcgHyMlB4i277zIdeAIJ-drArsFedlLlFVBLiuwo9q-IP/s640/zdist+006.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The histograms are almost exactly the same with the wide diffuser and bounce card .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgxjXlKQkx1GAif328xv0jidV7hLZhmTCvtoxvYaHwTIJFyvlzL9dZ06qj7UkRPrT5FYiTquP9JqnVHzDWiDWEzii3loBHPQUCxXcrKWw4XBwwn0Y-mEymDGhjQ4xVK1MDzeIb8Bk3RViEL/s1600/zdist+007.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgxjXlKQkx1GAif328xv0jidV7hLZhmTCvtoxvYaHwTIJFyvlzL9dZ06qj7UkRPrT5FYiTquP9JqnVHzDWiDWEzii3loBHPQUCxXcrKWw4XBwwn0Y-mEymDGhjQ4xVK1MDzeIb8Bk3RViEL/s640/zdist+007.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiSz0phEVcPFfL1Ig2r6XyWf-V6M_eZi5n93zkC1FNhv1xaKsi_65IZASf3nOu45pLZnMRR8YC4zG5jAgn0FaQxUyBRkw92amBOsS97Yuo1Tz_4YgCoQy-0Oty4Y1tpVz85s_il666LFi8c/s1600/zdist+008.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiSz0phEVcPFfL1Ig2r6XyWf-V6M_eZi5n93zkC1FNhv1xaKsi_65IZASf3nOu45pLZnMRR8YC4zG5jAgn0FaQxUyBRkw92amBOsS97Yuo1Tz_4YgCoQy-0Oty4Y1tpVz85s_il666LFi8c/s640/zdist+008.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZ7g1x548ZYeTbFzXiRduZ259VNEB0R4e74W9IRZcqoRMacSr9M9NsgUf6JXM8GmmR3WhV65PIi3Xx4cVM8Ype__NlmunxYIaTZaPryucQU9aJZKvQcM6Kl2r9qg1kcwj044BoEjILFoWF/s1600/zdist+009.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZ7g1x548ZYeTbFzXiRduZ259VNEB0R4e74W9IRZcqoRMacSr9M9NsgUf6JXM8GmmR3WhV65PIi3Xx4cVM8Ype__NlmunxYIaTZaPryucQU9aJZKvQcM6Kl2r9qg1kcwj044BoEjILFoWF/s640/zdist+009.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This explains the 'superior' output with bounce flash when the diffuser dome is used but doesn't really explain why the output increases with direct flash .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOI4hows-HnURszLw9s2mfaBgbfjns9C3auxfqA4BDdBxnEP1ZaETQotbim1jmqcFI9OgBPjKkCmcbL0MXP1WJAg4S1my1WhR85imlGwEGSsjIsLQrYOxb56CR7k8rv83GDAwBckWdqrlo/s1600/zBLdome+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOI4hows-HnURszLw9s2mfaBgbfjns9C3auxfqA4BDdBxnEP1ZaETQotbim1jmqcFI9OgBPjKkCmcbL0MXP1WJAg4S1my1WhR85imlGwEGSsjIsLQrYOxb56CR7k8rv83GDAwBckWdqrlo/s640/zBLdome+001.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKRMYh4GMJHC6RGkN83XIRir1o8pfmtp-i4NkWnMa-qdMFf07sJWoVj83ClH3VH9tGvGTfHUdWrt8pAQIKmM7fiT5I0oxrqL09zjDFP2T9GOH9DlwzAp_3XulYBkEIVcYCtJOwPpNYQUsK/s1600/zBLdome+002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKRMYh4GMJHC6RGkN83XIRir1o8pfmtp-i4NkWnMa-qdMFf07sJWoVj83ClH3VH9tGvGTfHUdWrt8pAQIKmM7fiT5I0oxrqL09zjDFP2T9GOH9DlwzAp_3XulYBkEIVcYCtJOwPpNYQUsK/s640/zBLdome+002.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I also did some tests with the SU800 and one flash in wireless mode .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">There was no change with focus distance showing that distance info doesn't seem to be any part of the equation with wireless flash .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">There does still seem to be that slightly better look and exposure with the diffuser dome though .....</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_neSQHAy_-nyrOfn7g08hREANW-p3Ta8ZJxKV5CERBRwI4ts13id9F-EkUK-twOmtXQQGeVO7jV_GZ9b6-JjHebuAF3prY0S8_elRYyBj3k45mPwmPzISQTHBhE4zmiJzkzUh52FC8x-P/s1600/zwireless+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_neSQHAy_-nyrOfn7g08hREANW-p3Ta8ZJxKV5CERBRwI4ts13id9F-EkUK-twOmtXQQGeVO7jV_GZ9b6-JjHebuAF3prY0S8_elRYyBj3k45mPwmPzISQTHBhE4zmiJzkzUh52FC8x-P/s640/zwireless+001.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-67580003633092868982010-03-20T20:03:00.000-07:002010-03-20T20:03:07.035-07:00Today I did some tests to determine working distance with an SB800 and under-exposed ambient and added the results on <a href="http://desmond-downs.blogspot.com/2010/03/flash-dramatic-lighting-in-daylight.html">my other blog .</a>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-90678777072529407522010-03-15T21:33:00.000-07:002010-03-15T21:35:12.680-07:00TTL/BL and metering modes .<span style="font-size: large;"><object height="385" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pfONFdXhO8o&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pfONFdXhO8o&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">In my video on how TTL/BL responds to a change in the meter someone suggested that it was not the movement of the meter that caused this change but rather the fact that the change from Centre Weighted metering to Matrix metering caused the flash system to meter differently . This is not so . TTL/BL uses the focus point diamond for its metering regardless of whether you choose matrix or CW metering - these modes do not change how the flash system meters .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/TTLBL.jpg" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The reason for the change in output is that TTL/BL is trying to balance the flash with the ambient already on the subject . If you are in CW metering mode with the meter centered while shooting manual , and you change to matrix metering which decides the subject is underexposed and causes the meter to suddenly register "-1" then TTL/BL will increase its output - not because of the different metering mode but rather because it noticed the meter change . It decides that since the ambient is underexposed it may as well take over the exposure by increasing flash output .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">My thought on the fact that you can't use TTL/BL with spot metering is that perhaps spot metering 'switches off' the rest of the metering pattern so TTL/BL can't do its calculations and therefore reverts back to TTL metering with the centre of the frame .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/TTL.jpg" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Either way I see no reason to suspect that the different metering modes [ CW vs matrix ] cause TTL/BL to meter with a different pattern - it still uses the focus point diamond - as with wireless CLS .</span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-84289000105391398932010-03-07T23:23:00.000-08:002010-03-07T23:23:03.970-08:00TTL/BL and bounce flash under-exposure .<span style="font-size: large;"></span><span style="font-size: large;">I still need to do some more tests with bounce flash in various situations to 'nail' the equation .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">With 'normal' bounce flash and perhaps the bounce card out or the diffuser dome on and a fair amount of 'forward ' light TTL/BL does a good job . But as soon as the flash head is pointed backwards and the distances start changing TTL/BL tends to expose for " the brightest object in the focus point diamond " which means that it under-exposes when there is white in the frame ....</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Lots of forward light = good exposure . </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zdome003.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a> </span><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zdome002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zdome002.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> Only bounce light = under-exposure with white in the frame .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> <a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zdome004.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zdome004.jpg" width="640" /></a></span> </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">I still need to do some tests to confirm my suspicion but I'm thinking that perhaps TTL/BL still 'remembers' the distance info from the lens when you tilt the flash head and doesn't totally forget about it .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">Perhaps it determines a minimum output for ''if the flash head was still facing forward'' and doesn't drop below that amount while still using part of its program to prevent blown highlights - which may be what backs off the exposure for whites to an average gray .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> At a set distance with the flash head facing forward it can 'conclude' that an object 'must be white' if it is reflecting so much light back on the pre-flash since it knows its distance , but when the flash head is tilted and it doesn't know how far the light will travel then it has to start using its ''preserve highlights'' part of the program along with the ''minimum output'' from distance info data [ perhaps ] which allows it to be quite accurate with a decent amount of forward flash . </span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">Perhaps this is why the manual suggests leaving the diffuser dome on at a 60 degree angle ''for best results ' ? </span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">I'm going to have to work out some sort of a test to figure this one out because this is the final link to '' predictability '' of flash with TTL/BL mode .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zmirrorr004.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-28341475642555416522010-03-05T11:24:00.000-08:002010-03-06T19:30:34.448-08:0010.) TTL/BL "Maps out" its subject .<span style="font-size: large;">Disclaimer : This theory is made up based on my studies of TTL/BL and is not information from Nikon themselves .... but I still think it may be the truth .</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This may be the most simple fact of TTL/BL - or just my wild speculation , but the easiest way to understand the fact that TTL/BL has a similar consistency to matrix metering is to think of it as the same program in that it can 'map out' its subject based on colour information [and the pre-flash reading] .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">How can TTL/BL have greater consistency regardless of subject size unless it is totally independent of subject size ?</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I'll start off with a simple subject with a dark background .</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6PPe1EN4yQ4Ki_9iEqZqlJs7Ffl_trfeVhWJMsylpFmqPWWaN2mENcQlIobihk4TGKqc2NsbmwMGYIhyphenhyphen9r4hNSb2mcJfq78XSI0jeq0_WR2Pxsu29FEVQmdYWdmWjTe3ipWQg88TCFNKZ/s1600-h/blmap+003.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6PPe1EN4yQ4Ki_9iEqZqlJs7Ffl_trfeVhWJMsylpFmqPWWaN2mENcQlIobihk4TGKqc2NsbmwMGYIhyphenhyphen9r4hNSb2mcJfq78XSI0jeq0_WR2Pxsu29FEVQmdYWdmWjTe3ipWQg88TCFNKZ/s640/blmap+003.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Whether we have the subject under-exposed or correctly exposed TTL sees this : The area it meters off - end of story .</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6PfswWMkj8byiCLS5LwHSBKYtDBN_rB1wdOoqnlHAnaM93amkDT4fhUOWDfVxDM3kV0OqTUu46zHhz_7T7ElFR8WXEvlrD0M502d9xyK8n4gKlJkuUMnp9bFZ4AmtuAOZvFtlvJZGO7MS/s1600-h/blmap+004fpcwttl.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6PfswWMkj8byiCLS5LwHSBKYtDBN_rB1wdOoqnlHAnaM93amkDT4fhUOWDfVxDM3kV0OqTUu46zHhz_7T7ElFR8WXEvlrD0M502d9xyK8n4gKlJkuUMnp9bFZ4AmtuAOZvFtlvJZGO7MS/s640/blmap+004fpcwttl.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"> TTL/BL sees the subject based on the matrix metering pattern which is what gives it the edge with reflective subjects [ more on that later ] .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">TTL needs to get an average gray in the centre of the frame and fires stronger when the subject does not fill the frame ....</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkRcEPPav_LFt_8qJk2tHfEOsh_jq3BfPbKd4Y5JqIpdF85ifp00i2-kqvGUM2GR8btD9d9KJqgx8YMtLwnr-0dnEGQAnf9Ibd7ZYZzoGkKYiKOH4ZSPJpi45zC6VDWPbj5Aj2I3Rzqfru/s1600-h/blmap+004fp.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkRcEPPav_LFt_8qJk2tHfEOsh_jq3BfPbKd4Y5JqIpdF85ifp00i2-kqvGUM2GR8btD9d9KJqgx8YMtLwnr-0dnEGQAnf9Ibd7ZYZzoGkKYiKOH4ZSPJpi45zC6VDWPbj5Aj2I3Rzqfru/s640/blmap+004fp.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">to get this result .. [ average filter applied to centre of frame ]</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRgs6nVkFkIv_9ucPYr7WRmV5MEff0UEPL99fpV68tmcnxgJgOja0nSvj04hVObr6q6nam6EXFAv2pBqDxh5WcaPpOVf5tmleEmJBXa5_00_Oy1bnYwZP5UntwNbQMVbHrpBdpgScAFLM9/s1600-h/blmap+004fpcwav.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRgs6nVkFkIv_9ucPYr7WRmV5MEff0UEPL99fpV68tmcnxgJgOja0nSvj04hVObr6q6nam6EXFAv2pBqDxh5WcaPpOVf5tmleEmJBXa5_00_Oy1bnYwZP5UntwNbQMVbHrpBdpgScAFLM9/s640/blmap+004fpcwav.jpg" width="640" /></a> </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">TTL/BL on the other hand fires a pre-flash [ as does TTL ] and 'maps out ' its subject based on the reading it receives ....</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2eiqcKN07WTpnIxX-VY7EIfjCOdsVljj9fKP8yinHL-xXWu4UJNSUyeryl89OVshkktqtT0zvUoB328LrX8gG74k0ZYK5F90bu76Yo3aIi6XHFuqnDp8s5buza1hyUe4bt_8C-I8Ngt3j/s1600-h/blmap+005fpm.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2eiqcKN07WTpnIxX-VY7EIfjCOdsVljj9fKP8yinHL-xXWu4UJNSUyeryl89OVshkktqtT0zvUoB328LrX8gG74k0ZYK5F90bu76Yo3aIi6XHFuqnDp8s5buza1hyUe4bt_8C-I8Ngt3j/s640/blmap+005fpm.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> It uses the 'focus point diamond' to determine where its subject is and 'maps it out' rather than relying on it being a certain size .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">And gives a much better exposure ....</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjosweLYWFmAsP_HR4Jz_Xlr6kR_1KiR-rb_xR94QwhUWi8q2SxlE3qKMNDm2z530uWykw65c9JwfdYDv55oDogIYLeMglCVufp2OJcbE26W6BAL6RRe_ZxCVRCHMT2m2insDFXTfP-Kr0c/s1600-h/blmap+005fp.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjosweLYWFmAsP_HR4Jz_Xlr6kR_1KiR-rb_xR94QwhUWi8q2SxlE3qKMNDm2z530uWykw65c9JwfdYDv55oDogIYLeMglCVufp2OJcbE26W6BAL6RRe_ZxCVRCHMT2m2insDFXTfP-Kr0c/s640/blmap+005fp.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">Then we move the subject off-centre and see what TTL does to get an average gray in the centre of the frame ....</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRNDENwRdyFdy7xLDKQgg57JYYmK4vJbTwroWggUfEpC-C92jjWFBF7z4cJ9Zo1gOg36EDOQ2CTEJcNZX_ap8_-qaK_LmNSDqA3bdXyuhE7zxDPXbBwcdPC63FXMNtlTuJT2_Ksb26vdqB/s1600-h/blmap+004ttl.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRNDENwRdyFdy7xLDKQgg57JYYmK4vJbTwroWggUfEpC-C92jjWFBF7z4cJ9Zo1gOg36EDOQ2CTEJcNZX_ap8_-qaK_LmNSDqA3bdXyuhE7zxDPXbBwcdPC63FXMNtlTuJT2_Ksb26vdqB/s640/blmap+004ttl.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">TTL flash still only sees the centre of the frame and has to totally over-expose the subject to get its average gray in the centre circle ...</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJ0Ee8Pwgi_MWgFJuwHPr3KaMohwC5TWsmtzNX9SvSLUa4DIXY3Wrn8zDFaYJF60pwYM4ISBzvbciUxLg3k5bpZCqKr4_U6D7vb6sOWAeP9s1svX7k7XwORKpB1Ha4z28RxrEqQH3SPT7n/s1600-h/blmap+004ttlavg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJ0Ee8Pwgi_MWgFJuwHPr3KaMohwC5TWsmtzNX9SvSLUa4DIXY3Wrn8zDFaYJF60pwYM4ISBzvbciUxLg3k5bpZCqKr4_U6D7vb6sOWAeP9s1svX7k7XwORKpB1Ha4z28RxrEqQH3SPT7n/s640/blmap+004ttlavg.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">Now here's how I define TTL/BL metering , if the subject is off centre it is still using the focus point diamond to 'find' its subject and 'map it out ' and so maintains consistency with its output .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghCFmGCiXHy46MbFXGrFKztWOJA_N5T9mfIPPClZvf_cPts0rO2EwnPM44S3ncQmx3XiiOefUsH1Ak5Lefrph84SE0iiIynkMqFi-YZW9oHBW4FxR-tLzuoJalW9rx_dNA0de6L5jSPzxr/s1600-h/blmap+005c.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghCFmGCiXHy46MbFXGrFKztWOJA_N5T9mfIPPClZvf_cPts0rO2EwnPM44S3ncQmx3XiiOefUsH1Ak5Lefrph84SE0iiIynkMqFi-YZW9oHBW4FxR-tLzuoJalW9rx_dNA0de6L5jSPzxr/s640/blmap+005c.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> When it did its pre-flash it mapped out the subject using the matrix metering pattern and was not fooled by the off-centre subject [ which is why you don't need to use 'fv-lock' with TTL/BL ] .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEih-7HhsXK9sOEBGE2Zkt7IQeueD-atnD-10s1woFE5iGPElEaJ4RcOEXAN74cTpBkPyGEG90vyQWtdV4BIq7mzIX8TsaAnDht85ZK3cKdMp2FwiHTguAFPtYc_AjkHw9cPg6z3LptFPUEg/s1600-h/blmap+005crnap.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEih-7HhsXK9sOEBGE2Zkt7IQeueD-atnD-10s1woFE5iGPElEaJ4RcOEXAN74cTpBkPyGEG90vyQWtdV4BIq7mzIX8TsaAnDht85ZK3cKdMp2FwiHTguAFPtYc_AjkHw9cPg6z3LptFPUEg/s640/blmap+005crnap.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> Here's another two samples with the subject below the centre of the frame .... TTL :</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjO6JFYtn5_5stceMYT5sipoWmFxGkY9d_s8p060APmk_m83TfuQNBd4GgDFDoT0LaJkrS-2TLHgxG3KyCPQiTywlusZ0-ekvrvFWV2k5oO3S8WhX_mjftTjA0zbi52IERRi-xlb3JJ0wVg/s1600-h/blmap+007.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjO6JFYtn5_5stceMYT5sipoWmFxGkY9d_s8p060APmk_m83TfuQNBd4GgDFDoT0LaJkrS-2TLHgxG3KyCPQiTywlusZ0-ekvrvFWV2k5oO3S8WhX_mjftTjA0zbi52IERRi-xlb3JJ0wVg/s640/blmap+007.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> TTL/BL :</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGSloHYz0OX6mRnd51XOUbb-gK9zm1H6EFXaq5jfy4e91t30yw1allmhT2qIpXiBBwoTK7_Zq6z72S0gZzFQVGLYI_-15tbB7LC4PLKc12bv4IfsMaTJkx5DFuKyQKGutQn3cA_92RHUyf/s1600-h/blmap+006.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGSloHYz0OX6mRnd51XOUbb-gK9zm1H6EFXaq5jfy4e91t30yw1allmhT2qIpXiBBwoTK7_Zq6z72S0gZzFQVGLYI_-15tbB7LC4PLKc12bv4IfsMaTJkx5DFuKyQKGutQn3cA_92RHUyf/s640/blmap+006.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">I can think of no possible scenario where TTL will beat TTL/BL with direct flash [ which you would mostly use outdoors ] . In brighter light [ with the ambient closer to correct exposure ] TTL/BL will back off accordingly while TTL will fire at exactly the same power it has here .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">On to the 'reflections' ... This is just theory based on some 'borrowed' information from the Canon E-TTL system . The Nikon manual mentions that TTL/BL is good for reflective surfaces but doesn't explain why . Obviously we can't simply assume that Canon and Nikon flash works the same way but much of E-TTL appears to work the same as TTL/BL and it is <a href="http://photonotes.org/articles/eos-flash/#ettlii">a useful explanation </a>with regard to E-TTL which mentions that " E-TTL II examines all evaluative metering zones both before and after the E-TTL preflash goes off. Those areas with relatively small changes in brightness are then weighted for flash metering. This is done to avoid the common E-TTL problem of highly reflective materials causing specular highlights in a flash-illuminated image and throwing off the flash metering. </span><span style="font-size: large;">". As mentioned we can't 'assume' that TTL/BL and E-TTL work exactly the same way but it's a highly likely possibility .</span> </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">If it does work the same way then my understanding of this is that TTL/BL can analyze the matrix metering pattern before the flash fires ....</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRXL50gFy42RLasFBOeTExZ9Lt8g-Wdz5k4Q0y2zudP21G7AFH9CBiVUxBxo58s6uTxlRwnLvgfYmYczyOm6fZFxaZ0qnroldNLs6eXvd2uq4w2V66ACUyGZYNG_fpp1mvVEAiHcm3Hlq7/s1600-h/blmap+003cc.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRXL50gFy42RLasFBOeTExZ9Lt8g-Wdz5k4Q0y2zudP21G7AFH9CBiVUxBxo58s6uTxlRwnLvgfYmYczyOm6fZFxaZ0qnroldNLs6eXvd2uq4w2V66ACUyGZYNG_fpp1mvVEAiHcm3Hlq7/s640/blmap+003cc.jpg" width="640" /></a><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">And then when it fires the pre-flash it can trace out the subject and pick up the reflections and reject them from the metering equation ...</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"></span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpyS0SdEdRQr1jwReV_AxXOzM167HjTuJcmS6ACAldGPN0MdXlkwtCCs-Ou0GdUnL3njpCPl6Fz-O05VACrxPi9376m0wH5dfKDjeIgm6ugLbT4UvE0hqbmu3_Zma9B_Oiqk_LufVfO_7e/s1600-h/blmap+006ref.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpyS0SdEdRQr1jwReV_AxXOzM167HjTuJcmS6ACAldGPN0MdXlkwtCCs-Ou0GdUnL3njpCPl6Fz-O05VACrxPi9376m0wH5dfKDjeIgm6ugLbT4UvE0hqbmu3_Zma9B_Oiqk_LufVfO_7e/s640/blmap+006ref.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">This may also be why TTL/BL doesn't work when you switch to spot metering . It needs the whole pattern to be active to do its calculations . Changing to spot metering 'switches off' the rest of the metering pattern and so TTL/BL can't do its calculations unless you are in centre weighted or matrix metering - because then the whole pattern is available for its use .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-88286307506881686712010-03-05T00:12:00.000-08:002010-03-05T00:12:01.505-08:00Incorrect flash information in books<span style="font-size: large;">To make beginners feel better : professionals make mistakes too - but unfortunately sometimes they publish them as well . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Why do people write photography books ? For the money , not because they want to help people !</span><br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">{Please note : I am not condemning entire books - just warning about information that could be misleading to a beginner - the rest of the information in the books mentioned is useful ! } </span></b><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Many of these people are very knowledgeable about photography but are not necessarily 100% right in all their statements .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">As I read through some of the more popular books I see mistakes that could greatly mislead beginners so I thought I would list them here for the benefit of beginners trying to find their way through a sea of [ sometimes incorrect] information . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">It's confusing enough as a beginner without reading misleading statements that could further confuse your learning process !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsVEU2ZbkmvyhQxwF0uUdORwTU7ACpWTANmIyDxYHrK1v-NSODX-qI_bSp6Nk4AOkRD_1s8xxIGMH7XP_GCEW1rvqBax_oh_wEGxyD2b_hl8-z6L7hRYED6Xb42AnZN8xkdJf3AWsFRcZg/s1600-h/zbooks+011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a></span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhSuJixw2XGnbNXt-BOjclvdkE1TI9NSH2DL-d9y3e2UL155P2M2kGMsMDbWsfc6q4MfkYvE88krk4a5hmqS4O6V4dp0DzEaZOYsPV_X9X_EazYYpxeEILVey1TCHpi0GuCyyBgVgdJWRj/s1600-h/zzbooks+011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhxwwFgK5j4D35jYIRTBANwqLAEy45pg0IK3SGp68upSqDJ01UejN_f1hHTWSdUN3oUYa-QSU1Tgb9F0MePWlMpVksHqqJ93e97ZLGWT0SDh4IXhRMVHny-sipyJXKGeQdeDfvc8u4oEiad/s1600-h/zzbooks+011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhxwwFgK5j4D35jYIRTBANwqLAEy45pg0IK3SGp68upSqDJ01UejN_f1hHTWSdUN3oUYa-QSU1Tgb9F0MePWlMpVksHqqJ93e97ZLGWT0SDh4IXhRMVHny-sipyJXKGeQdeDfvc8u4oEiad/s320/zzbooks+011.jpg" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I am busy with this book and on page 18 the author makes the statement about "BL" flash that in this mode " the flash is trying to make the foreground and background roughly equivalent exposure zones " .... that's close to what the manual says which is also ambiguous . Then he goes on to state that if the background is dark it will blow the subject trying to light the background as well . Nothing could be further from the truth ! In <a href="http://desmonddowns-ttlblflash.blogspot.com/2009/06/nikons-new-ttlbl-flash-and-cls-wireless.html">my blog on TTL/BL</a> I explain my tests and how it really works . </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">{5/03/2010 : </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I've decided to expand on this particular subject since many are questioning my basis for stating that the book's description is totally wrong . The problem lies primarily with Nikon who haven't explained things properly to us .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Page 37 of the SB800 manual describes TTL/BL flash in a very ambiguous way [ I'll go so far as to say the manual is wrong as well in this respect ] ... with regard to TTL/BL "Automatic balanced Fill Flash " it states " The flash output is adjusted for a well balanced exposure of the main subject and background " .... work that one out without getting everyone confused . I started doing tests with TTL/BL flash almost a year ago on <a href="http://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=224862&highlight=TTL%2FBL+tests">Nikoncafe</a> . After many test images [ you can see them on my photobucket album in the <a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/">"flash"</a> album , most have text on them ] I concluded that TTL/BL only cares about correct exposure on the subject and is far more accurate than TTL flash .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">To stick to the subject at hand with TTL/BL it would be more accurate to read : " The flash output level is automatically adjusted for a well balanced exposure of the main subject taking the 'background' or ambient lighting already on it into account " .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">As they say "a picture speaks a thousand words "</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The author stated that the flash would "arm the photon warhead " and " obliterate the darkness " .. some simple tests will confirm the inaccuracy of this statement .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> To digress slightly TTL flash does this when the subject is smaller than the metering area in the centre of the frame ...</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zoutside002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="265" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zoutside002.jpg" width="400" /></a> </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">Now we go to TTL/BL , due to the fact that it can 'map out' its subject using the matrix metering pattern - and has the advantage of distance info - it is much more accurate :</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zoutside003.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="265" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zoutside003.jpg" width="400" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"> <span style="font-size: large;">So : Did TTL/BL try to obliterate the darkness ? No , it concentrated on the subject . If anyone still doesn't believe me than all you have to do is try it out for yourself and you will see that the statement that TTL/BL will try to light the background is totally wrong .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"> <span style="font-size: large;">So , Never base your statements on something you have read in a manual or heard form someone else - do your own tests and you will learn so much more .... and never make statements in a book based on what you think the manual means - it will get back to you in the end ! }</span> </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The incorrect statement is due to a rather ambiguous statement in the Nikon manual that has been badly misinterpreted . In reality , the wireless CLS that the author praises so highly uses the same metering mode as TTL/BL ! BL mode will try to get perfect exposure on the subject " and take the ambient[ background] lighting on the subject into account " - that's the balancing part of it .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">On to page 258 " I want the light source to be at least twice as far away as I had it , so that's gonna mean twice the power " ..... this is totally wrong , due to the<a href="http://desmond-downs.blogspot.com/2010/01/i-know-this-isnt-perfect-test-but-i.html"> inverse square law </a>twice the distance means 4X the power ! </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This may have been a genuine mistake overlooked by a hasty review before publishing - but it's going to have a lot of beginners believing the wrong thing .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The other book I was reading recently ....</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjuGgFIo5VT6YNW47qeRvJohY2XrnpxS2Coq0HGpwlcHXpyKcBdzEGeTXWlEPZhK946yDLahnj0b-TDQdbqo0dZFyATVl_9LX5KwN9PBqJBkXN-EGKpFeognlFFNgQ8s2O3DwzdwPceeQjO/s1600-h/zbooks+010.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a></span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVQcVvFJGs8KhfYLqjO6wT745VrhYsjMO7G7J6n8tqFiV0ZEWD5GGypgZeNUeUJncI0vzRnBpaR_NI_I-9SW8sa_LEaMBTEusrxRrJ11gU8G0j4-K5NzcT7AZoT-gIzvFcWd3MQrwx1LBD/s1600-h/zzbooks+010.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9Y3kL7nVm0C9jpRHnoAeDYZoeDg7SC3U7r9tYdMsc91rY0sYE9NT9jdkRJt-OBUi9XlFy9BalLZ2UQQKT7UyDpVZTCIVci2vZMqKDHOgol9EW6fcmsqTYRTn8o0P1oh0gFUMP0iqO1k41/s1600-h/zzbooks+010.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9Y3kL7nVm0C9jpRHnoAeDYZoeDg7SC3U7r9tYdMsc91rY0sYE9NT9jdkRJt-OBUi9XlFy9BalLZ2UQQKT7UyDpVZTCIVci2vZMqKDHOgol9EW6fcmsqTYRTn8o0P1oh0gFUMP0iqO1k41/s320/zzbooks+010.jpg" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">.... has a suggestion on page 41 about using fill flash outdoors .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVUm-NLmgGx-zoCE5tgrg0mMvXf7r0jzaLgpYBzfAWEVwg_JoxIBTLXplJAHHLQOQ5ZZHoseGiJvj8x4p_mQvn6yJ9H7d-8RGKOv4ifjU_KAB7DWUdfuYtNtkDXIe5NbsnrDZAS7jcMs-G/s1600-h/zbooks+008.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a></span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg88Da8WNscrSqLA-ncFhYeaWzrGsdhAsCaDYsgcQuTyV3Xe2qxoPef5X0lckm2T4VdhVKjswsbi3mQ7bcgyZ8irb_pKcK23JNKx_SxYWEBYm7nvbnVRK-XuoLHhd4yCUcL8EVxTkpJutCB/s1600-h/zbooks+009.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg88Da8WNscrSqLA-ncFhYeaWzrGsdhAsCaDYsgcQuTyV3Xe2qxoPef5X0lckm2T4VdhVKjswsbi3mQ7bcgyZ8irb_pKcK23JNKx_SxYWEBYm7nvbnVRK-XuoLHhd4yCUcL8EVxTkpJutCB/s320/zbooks+009.jpg" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">I have seriously never seen anything so pointless ! </span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> How much of the light in this image do you think is going to go sideways .... maybe 1% of 5% ? You'll have your flash firing at full power every shot just to put catch-lights in the subjects eyes , and those catch-lights will be "L"- shaped .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">No wonder we have global warming and professionals complain about burning out flash heads ! </span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">Please note : I agree that fill flash should be used outdoors ! You will do well to follow the advice to use it .... BUT : wasting flash into the air makes no sense when you can simply dial back direct flash for the same results and use less than 1/100th of the power .</span></b></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> <br />
</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">This weekend I will do some tests to verify the amount of flash that hits the subject with the bounce card .</span></div><span style="font-size: large;">With outdoor flash you will have the flash dialed down , your working distance will already be greatly reduced and you will hardly notice direct flash at -3 compensation when used as fill flash .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> Why fire the flash at the moon and only get 0.05% of the flash power hitting the subject ? That's one way to fry a flash and waste battery power . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">On to the tests :<br />
<br />
<img height="424" onclick="if(this.alt)
window.open('http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zLshape001.jpg');" onload="if(largerThan(this.width,1024))
{this.width=1024;this.alt='Click here to see a large version';
this.style.border='3px double black'; } else { this.style.border='1px
solid black'; }" onmouseover="if(this.alt) this.style.cursor='pointer';" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zLshape001.jpg" style="border: 1px solid black;" width="640" /><br />
<br />
To give him the benefit of the doubt I stood 6 feet away , he mentioned 8-10 feet .<br />
<br />
<img height="424" onclick="if(this.alt)
window.open('http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zLshape002.jpg');" onload="if(largerThan(this.width,1024))
{this.width=1024;this.alt='Click here to see a large version';
this.style.border='3px double black'; } else { this.style.border='1px
solid black'; }" onmouseover="if(this.alt) this.style.cursor='pointer';" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zLshape002.jpg" style="border: 1px solid black;" width="640" /><br />
<br />
Just to make sure we were getting the full potential of the flash I set the flash to manual and full power ....<br />
<br />
<img height="424" onclick="if(this.alt)
window.open('http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zLshape004.jpg');" onload="if(largerThan(this.width,1024))
{this.width=1024;this.alt='Click here to see a large version';
this.style.border='3px double black'; } else { this.style.border='1px
solid black'; }" onmouseover="if(this.alt) this.style.cursor='pointer';" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zLshape004.jpg" style="border: 1px solid black;" width="640" /><br />
<br />
Pretty dismal isn't it [ not the subject! ]<br />
<br />
Then I went to TTL/BL -1 direct flash ...<br />
<br />
<img height="424" onclick="if(this.alt)
window.open('http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zLshape005.jpg');" onload="if(largerThan(this.width,1024))
{this.width=1024;this.alt='Click here to see a large version';
this.style.border='3px double black'; } else { this.style.border='1px
solid black'; }" onmouseover="if(this.alt) this.style.cursor='pointer';" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zLshape005.jpg" style="border: 1px solid black;" width="640" /><br />
<br />
I won't show the picture of my face 2 feet from the camera but when I put the camera in manual at those settings at 1/128th power it tells me I have 0.6m working distance .... with direct flash that is .<br />
At 0.6m [ 2 feet ] with the flash in the suggested position there is still not enough flash at full power .... this suggests that we are getting less than 1/128th of the power from the sideways light using the suggested setup .<br />
You will use more than 150 X the flash power and flatten your batteries more than 150 X faster using this ' technique ' .<br />
I rest my case ... it's a bad suggestion regardless of who made it .</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">When I buy a camera I expect everything on it to work .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I expect everything in the manual to be correct .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">And when I pay for a book of photography knowledge I expect it to be correct .<br />
</span> <span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">If anyone has anything to add to this page please let me know !<br />
</span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-7062195345536661462010-02-28T23:38:00.000-08:002010-02-28T23:38:50.103-08:00Flash : Diffuser dome and "spread" testsI decided to do some comparisons between normal direct flash , then with the diffuser dome and with the wide angle diffuser .<br />
When I set the lens to 50mm and set iso 200 , 1/200th sec and F11 [ A good 'average' setting for a sunny day with a bit of haze ] the flash tells me I have 5.7m working distance which is actually the maximum distance it could fully light the subject , just as fill flash you could probably double that distance .<br />
<br />
This is the flash pattern at 50mm zoom and 1/16th power .<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEidqyiExkEt607vlQMTcVZx4gnkPpAemBJIJ3uZwnCaJY75fmaSMipFNF9UZwkNHPdkNyBOKlNne96aRuJxGmE0BIwUCacYWUoOv6caH-nZ46MRWQioNfuEWVgAeFivSKGR5esOgV6MGZM2/s1600-h/zdiffuserdome+006.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEidqyiExkEt607vlQMTcVZx4gnkPpAemBJIJ3uZwnCaJY75fmaSMipFNF9UZwkNHPdkNyBOKlNne96aRuJxGmE0BIwUCacYWUoOv6caH-nZ46MRWQioNfuEWVgAeFivSKGR5esOgV6MGZM2/s640/zdiffuserdome+006.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
With the diffuser dome fitted the camera tells me I now have 2m working distance which equates to 1/8th of the original flash power actually hitting the subject . This is its pattern .<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXpQ_w7Ier09GgOSUoNZHfBmPF38rK3gcVWwQpx4NsqLecnD5L6TMaYH-X3l85Ps2dZeEFmp_81qR7m_DTVA5fioB-0MJrNpqKGLkVitfILh335AjpYnM0HQDElTBijMLbLjhtSiSMPHkW/s1600-h/zdiffuserdome+007.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXpQ_w7Ier09GgOSUoNZHfBmPF38rK3gcVWwQpx4NsqLecnD5L6TMaYH-X3l85Ps2dZeEFmp_81qR7m_DTVA5fioB-0MJrNpqKGLkVitfILh335AjpYnM0HQDElTBijMLbLjhtSiSMPHkW/s640/zdiffuserdome+007.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Then with the wide angle diffuser out we have 2.5m or 1/5th of the original power which is a bit better than the diffuser dome - and this is its pattern .<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQchAyQyFaFzMWcCm9IlSOWjOPrpO0CYq3J0cu43b2yPgMhiL8L6jI9rGENBgrk79v5vapOB6w9qshLDwHoU_mINGn8CYSzFX78t2mVgL1sO-mHFc8QgieC5rWb5Ey1Tw-9LEB8J1-a4we/s1600-h/zdiffuserdome+008.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQchAyQyFaFzMWcCm9IlSOWjOPrpO0CYq3J0cu43b2yPgMhiL8L6jI9rGENBgrk79v5vapOB6w9qshLDwHoU_mINGn8CYSzFX78t2mVgL1sO-mHFc8QgieC5rWb5Ey1Tw-9LEB8J1-a4we/s640/zdiffuserdome+008.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br />
In my mind it would be better to use the wide diffuser when firing into an umbrella .<br />
With indoor flash you would be working with wider apertures and letting in more light so I suppose the diffuser dome would have its uses there since the light going sideways will add to the exposure when it bounces .<br />
I don't see much use in having the diffuser dome on outdoors since just about everything that hits the subject will be direct light anyway so direct flash when using fill makes more sense to me - and the diffuser dome will use 8X the battery power for the same lighting .<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Now have a look at this comparison . This afternoon I decided to see how much of the flash power is wasted outdoors with nothing to bounce off . I fired the flash at 1/500th and F14 with my D50 and the Yongnuo 602 kit mounted on my D90 - the second shot was at F25 .<br />
I had the lens on the test camera fully framing the sideways calendar - anything outside the calendar is wasted flash .<br />
It would appear that making the flash head rectangular has worked out to be counter-productive in that it creates a diamond pattern at a 45 degree angle to the subject !<br />
I would also imagine that by making a reflective 'snoot' around the flash head that bounces this wasted pattern back to the subject we would get a much better diffusion effect than by putting on the diffuser dome which has almost exactly the same area as the flash head itself anyway - I reckon we could also have close to twice the flash power hitting the subject considering how much falls outside the frame .<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1TcK2PlQTI4tMwkWi66551vFG0zfRFfmx-elqwhaOCqQek5C9xAkBpb5swjHBdeSCc13LUUnERLKhcMcGobifTk0iqJqyx4TUuV1K4r3oISekberP_mgRmBwkzJEudQVL7M8g_2p1s7Tc/s1600-h/zspread+002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1TcK2PlQTI4tMwkWi66551vFG0zfRFfmx-elqwhaOCqQek5C9xAkBpb5swjHBdeSCc13LUUnERLKhcMcGobifTk0iqJqyx4TUuV1K4r3oISekberP_mgRmBwkzJEudQVL7M8g_2p1s7Tc/s640/zspread+002.jpg" width="640" /></a> </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"> <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLVVm-kaoVhbEIAfS_4HSRnXrUGyhZpV4aeznXxkkK0XTRTvrgCqd9SwI84d8k1GnvOWoTVM1FVywUGiJKIwMETsxqBl3oCvHKnBCLkC308gFtIJ6qO5y5lgclfzSYclWhKheCyg85lpId/s1600-h/zspread+009.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLVVm-kaoVhbEIAfS_4HSRnXrUGyhZpV4aeznXxkkK0XTRTvrgCqd9SwI84d8k1GnvOWoTVM1FVywUGiJKIwMETsxqBl3oCvHKnBCLkC308gFtIJ6qO5y5lgclfzSYclWhKheCyg85lpId/s640/zspread+009.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-8197845287909281562010-02-22T23:51:00.000-08:002010-02-22T23:51:32.887-08:00Videos : Flash studies .How TTL/BL works <br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/he35-IRSd2c&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/he35-IRSd2c&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
TTL/BL and wireless flash compared ...<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/P8UkiBLrBH8&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/P8UkiBLrBH8&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
TTL/BL and metering modes <br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pfONFdXhO8o&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pfONFdXhO8o&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TL/BL flash and the focus point diamond .<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qA0ffdKXqSE&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qA0ffdKXqSE&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
Flash basics : TTL flash <br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dT1B3bnvHlY&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dT1B3bnvHlY&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
Flash basics : Two exposures in one .<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dNmu6_6y7aM&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dNmu6_6y7aM&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
On camera flash comparisons ;<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/J67TIzIHxps&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/J67TIzIHxps&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
How high-fp or auto-fp flash works :<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sxv5yic59Go&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sxv5yic59Go&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
Sound activated flash trigger :<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6LM2scWp1Gs&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6LM2scWp1Gs&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Motion detecting camera trigger ...<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8YdXaHHBbPk&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8YdXaHHBbPk&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Tests with the bounce card and diffuser dome .<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nkmQmbxZUu4&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nkmQmbxZUu4&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
Rear curtain flash .<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LsvbSxBwj_Q&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LsvbSxBwj_Q&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-47412442227224493042010-02-18T01:01:00.001-08:002010-05-15T01:47:40.627-07:00Is E-TTL the same as TTL/BL now ?!<span style="font-size: large;">After doing my own research to work through the confusion of the change of Nikon TTL/BL from "back-lit " mode to "balanced fill flash " I published a blog on it called <a href="http://desmonddowns-ttlblflash.blogspot.com/2009/06/nikons-new-ttlbl-flash-and-cls-wireless.html" target="_blank">"Nikon's "new" TTL/BL" </a>to help others understand how it works .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Due to the fact that Nikon had changed the system without really explaining much it has taken a while to convince many of those who thought they knew how it worked .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I recently decided to start reading up on Canon E-TTLii and found that it is almost the same system - so now many of you Canon users could probably learn about E-TTLii from my blog on TTL/BL !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">While reading up on it [ I have not done my own tests but Canon seems to hand out the information more freely than Nikon !] the similarities are the fact that </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">1.) E-TTLii now uses distance information as does BL mode .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">2.) E-TTLii now takes the ambient into account [ based on my understanding of the description of how it works ] so should need less exposure compensation when the ambient is correctly exposed</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">3.) E-TTLii can analyze a pattern and determine that a bright spot is a reflection based on its pre-flash reading compared to the ambient reading of the subject . I would imagine that Nikon has a slight advantage here with its greater number of metering segments - Nikon also advertises that TTL/BL is good for reflective surfaces and I am assuming that it is for a similar reason to the Canon description.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I see that E-TTL has also gone through a few changes but at least Canon changed the name accordingly and explained those changes .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Perhaps a diligent Canon user could duplicate some of my tests on my <a class="nuwiki_autolink" href="http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=267779" nuwiki_id="267779">blog</a> and confirm 1.) the change in exposure with a change in focus distance ...</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">2.) and then perhaps the most important test of all is the one to see if the flash output changes with a change in the meter reading . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Set the camera up on a tripod with a subject to the side . Set the metering mode to CW or pattern and find a point where the exposure registers a one stop difference between the two modes without changing any other settings . If E-TTLii changes its output based on a simple change in the position of the meter then it is the same as TTL/Bl mode .</span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-10298742639523415012010-02-12T15:48:00.000-08:002010-02-22T21:57:25.135-08:00A failed attempt at extending the SU800's range<span style="font-size: large;">Today I went into<a href="http://www.jaycar.co.nz/productView.asp?ID=AR1817"> Jaycar electronics </a>and asked if I could try something out with their IR remote control extenders . We used the newer model than this picture but the principle is the same .</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.jaycar.co.nz/products_uploaded/productLarge_13129.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://www.jaycar.co.nz/products_uploaded/productLarge_13129.jpg" width="320" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"> My idea was to be able to extend the working distance of wireless TTL using an infra-red repeater system as used to extend the working distance of the TV remote . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">My thoughts were that if this system could receive the IR signal from the SU800 , transmit it to the receiver , and change it back to IR then perhaps reliable wireless TTL could be achieved at up to 100 metres .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The shop assistant was very knowledgeable and spoke about frequencies and wavelengths and said it sounded quite feasible .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">We set the SB800 up on remote mode at one end of the store , I triggered it a few times with the SU800 on my D90 and then walked to the front of the store and made sure it couldn't trigger directly from the SU800 , connected up the remote extender modules - but had no success . Then we decided to tell the trainee assistant to actually turn the receiver on and tried again with no success . Finally we convinced the trainee assistant to push the power supply plug all the way in and actually make the lights come on ..... but still no success . I never even got a pre-flash out of the remote .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">There were various measuring devices in the store and with one of the CCTV systems we could switch it into a mode that actually made the SU800 signal look like a flash burst . Then we tried to save the signal into a programmable remote and it froze the remote up - twice ! The batteries had to be taken out to reset the system on the fancy remote .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">We tried getting real close to the transmitter - every possible variable was excluded [ I think ? ] and the conclusion was that the Nikon trigger signal was too advanced for any of the systems in the shop .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Now I have the shop assistant thinking and perhaps he will come up with something :) .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I would appreciate any suggestions in this regard .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">23 February 2010 : Duncan from <a href="http://www.hellophoto.co.nz/">www.hellophoto.co.nz </a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">donated a set of <a href="http://www.satcom.com.au/product_info.php?products_id=162">AR 1830</a> remote extenders " to the cause " and I set them up also with no results .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I may have to 'dissect' the controllers .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<br />
.Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-1800774640997927502010-02-04T00:24:00.000-08:002010-02-05T10:12:30.701-08:00Yongnuo RF 602 wireless flash trigger .<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn7_1C2gI7cqXKMGPmg6YVKy8rpAK5Wd6-KOcmwsSPcTDbQVale0spyQdeX62YkZe64o-Zu7ESXxfwYlomjaxtvKmx57NRQqUYvjmjnBturJW8-ul_mwmz3lJEbOLCeGhARZ6GckhVSQkk/s1600-h/zrf602+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="262" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn7_1C2gI7cqXKMGPmg6YVKy8rpAK5Wd6-KOcmwsSPcTDbQVale0spyQdeX62YkZe64o-Zu7ESXxfwYlomjaxtvKmx57NRQqUYvjmjnBturJW8-ul_mwmz3lJEbOLCeGhARZ6GckhVSQkk/s400/zrf602+001.jpg" width="400" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn7_1C2gI7cqXKMGPmg6YVKy8rpAK5Wd6-KOcmwsSPcTDbQVale0spyQdeX62YkZe64o-Zu7ESXxfwYlomjaxtvKmx57NRQqUYvjmjnBturJW8-ul_mwmz3lJEbOLCeGhARZ6GckhVSQkk/s1600-h/zrf602+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a></div><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Today I tested my new Yongnuo RF602 wireless flash transmitter , this is what you get in the package . </span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7LAauwREC7CPOeXivqqQfcUpk46FEWW_ohF9PimETp8TbkBWb9m2K2dDhY-rWGBUXpKuH9Itdtuwg9sohXqLH0SIqptpeMpjoDewjLEYoCLiyuTd-Ahfb7igZ90R329txUN1vVfYTt3T_/s1600-h/zrf602+004.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="307" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7LAauwREC7CPOeXivqqQfcUpk46FEWW_ohF9PimETp8TbkBWb9m2K2dDhY-rWGBUXpKuH9Itdtuwg9sohXqLH0SIqptpeMpjoDewjLEYoCLiyuTd-Ahfb7igZ90R329txUN1vVfYTt3T_/s400/zrf602+004.jpg" width="400" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7LAauwREC7CPOeXivqqQfcUpk46FEWW_ohF9PimETp8TbkBWb9m2K2dDhY-rWGBUXpKuH9Itdtuwg9sohXqLH0SIqptpeMpjoDewjLEYoCLiyuTd-Ahfb7igZ90R329txUN1vVfYTt3T_/s1600-h/zrf602+004.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">When you look at the instructions you feel like contacting the manufacturers and asking them " Who learned you to spoke english so deliciously ? " </span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7LAauwREC7CPOeXivqqQfcUpk46FEWW_ohF9PimETp8TbkBWb9m2K2dDhY-rWGBUXpKuH9Itdtuwg9sohXqLH0SIqptpeMpjoDewjLEYoCLiyuTd-Ahfb7igZ90R329txUN1vVfYTt3T_/s1600-h/zrf602+004.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj8SaSzhRDDPTwg6BszpfIXfinGBqnTGK-RBZef1-_4E5lKcHMHlBYRaza2zWcD25oBBW8VU-dkW-GkWKKqtM-dQNGRsLFAV4UWyNGZhge3fDp-fmUDV0r804WZ7k8xLonhLoV-fpI0J83f/s1600-h/zrf602+003.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEht6N8Crx9X2rs_OFKL-Ka4VXM3nW5FxZJItDnE5Awb4_5OVP2g4lgGhFR-Mnghyphenhyphen_EnDc0YYV1CWjLlDJPw0xitLVK7AIB6Ks3PSyDvn2xF2oN84VMb-ySnuBr7c4NsJ4Q_TT1C0UMV2l1I/s1600-h/zzrf602+003.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="148" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEht6N8Crx9X2rs_OFKL-Ka4VXM3nW5FxZJItDnE5Awb4_5OVP2g4lgGhFR-Mnghyphenhyphen_EnDc0YYV1CWjLlDJPw0xitLVK7AIB6Ks3PSyDvn2xF2oN84VMb-ySnuBr7c4NsJ4Q_TT1C0UMV2l1I/s640/zzrf602+003.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This is a close up view of the transmitter and receiver</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOohGsX5vQK0sraYsrgWbNnOO0QI9ybv27d8N6Vi-YKpeCbkwj6kjJ0YxjXVjd3uJRvPTGOZHsNVppOfwSQH6XXIUJxgQY3qgsXybgH-a4JW5_OcsAXxHI0lWNA9d3kHrRu9J_op2yH948/s1600-h/zrf602+007.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOohGsX5vQK0sraYsrgWbNnOO0QI9ybv27d8N6Vi-YKpeCbkwj6kjJ0YxjXVjd3uJRvPTGOZHsNVppOfwSQH6XXIUJxgQY3qgsXybgH-a4JW5_OcsAXxHI0lWNA9d3kHrRu9J_op2yH948/s320/zrf602+007.jpg" /></a> <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEheeWykt-dKzk32MDKFRLLiDig3tnNYYHwNFtmmox6d6_VcJ54IozJ0eYpuyobMTCcz2np7xtNI78WYCSLybNAaravcc1Zz7_N1L59KmnWxtQVA8d9su0PAJLQ5FuwrkZKVuT5uhKO6vReo/s1600-h/zrf602+008.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEheeWykt-dKzk32MDKFRLLiDig3tnNYYHwNFtmmox6d6_VcJ54IozJ0eYpuyobMTCcz2np7xtNI78WYCSLybNAaravcc1Zz7_N1L59KmnWxtQVA8d9su0PAJLQ5FuwrkZKVuT5uhKO6vReo/s320/zrf602+008.jpg" /></a> </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">Apparently the two back contacts aren't connected to anything inside which either means they are only there to make it look more 'functional' or perhaps they are there because the next model [maybe the "903's"] will have TTL functionality !</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">It was also suggested that they may just be for other cameras and the wiring gets connected for the brand you choose . </span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">There are contacts so you can use them to trigger the shutter release of some cameras at 100m . </span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPus34_5QKxoBZk0yIBKxG0j-IyVeT0B8aj7MUQA760xlCamJm6QLwmKx75QnJ_0L4i4YG8kdHtaXkvPv6ZZbIT6beFUk8lBUM3OslN8UZM4KrIi7SlXbMfOZquH-safx3lHA5lXFlSrH9/s1600-h/zrf602+020.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPus34_5QKxoBZk0yIBKxG0j-IyVeT0B8aj7MUQA760xlCamJm6QLwmKx75QnJ_0L4i4YG8kdHtaXkvPv6ZZbIT6beFUk8lBUM3OslN8UZM4KrIi7SlXbMfOZquH-safx3lHA5lXFlSrH9/s320/zrf602+020.jpg" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKwZ2c2dOajCZKrJf03YnPdtY_KvO00TlHcCDtE5tN14MKoChh-E5T2H3zDErRGkXoSBOi9s85oEbZdn_PaJ3d20BirmfU7_F7UWgj4gYOlAJLtFCri9bk3Lgt3Dwxre1WBP0X2m7VClz-/s1600-h/zrf602+022.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKwZ2c2dOajCZKrJf03YnPdtY_KvO00TlHcCDtE5tN14MKoChh-E5T2H3zDErRGkXoSBOi9s85oEbZdn_PaJ3d20BirmfU7_F7UWgj4gYOlAJLtFCri9bk3Lgt3Dwxre1WBP0X2m7VClz-/s320/zrf602+022.jpg" /></a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> Then I set up the tripod with my old SB24 so I could test the fastest trigger time </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> [ which they advertise as being 1/250th sec - mainly because that's the fastest time most cameras can synch flash ] , and the furthest distance it could work at .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEih2SfcxKL8OUkzNVrjmvUEndT9wvOqVJUjecQ50ro7I7ERPO0Qk3xrmS3cKd5niCNMgtvP6ueOdF4xZnANM72jBsoHOClrYrh1B42VOLmYSf38jWicqYyq8HShPLQ3jH96hTU5aELqPq2Z/s1600-h/zrf602+023.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="459" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEih2SfcxKL8OUkzNVrjmvUEndT9wvOqVJUjecQ50ro7I7ERPO0Qk3xrmS3cKd5niCNMgtvP6ueOdF4xZnANM72jBsoHOClrYrh1B42VOLmYSf38jWicqYyq8HShPLQ3jH96hTU5aELqPq2Z/s640/zrf602+023.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I used the D50 because it has an electronically switched sensor/shutter so it can synch flash at 1/500th sec normally and if it doesn't know there is a flash connected - as with a wireless trigger - there is no limit to the shutter speed you can use with flash .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I explain this in my blog on <a href="http://desmonddowns-ttlblflash.blogspot.com/2010/01/realsynch-flash.html">realsynch flash </a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Standing next to the flash I managed to trigger it at 1/800th second .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgBPsfg6eOW9usZjSYA4va1f-W_X_6NneHuU3dPXgY5Am7G9syNYdNOkQrrCiMmTGKPPBQZbBROf9aQPFNry1bGhMdxxXiabm1lLUhZi8DhToHzrBUPUDk7YO4Gf5dD_qh-RLWFd6yrFwkC/s1600-h/zrf602+027.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="266" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgBPsfg6eOW9usZjSYA4va1f-W_X_6NneHuU3dPXgY5Am7G9syNYdNOkQrrCiMmTGKPPBQZbBROf9aQPFNry1bGhMdxxXiabm1lLUhZi8DhToHzrBUPUDk7YO4Gf5dD_qh-RLWFd6yrFwkC/s400/zrf602+027.jpg" width="400" /></a> </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">Then I took a walk across the farm and managed to trigger that flash from positions 1 , 2 and 3 . With position 3 I had gone out of range and had to walk back to that point to trigger the flash again ..... BUT : I could trigger the flash wirelessly at 1/800th sec from each of these positions .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span> </div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjmAXIMhpyy_E_lJmwnYxpcC9NxTQu9G80vp6CLVCXOjuk8QbLasTkDfQzTNmUFVh2nE7CAsrB3oISyulpxbgzmHACglEb2WGKM8ZPHC5bNUGw2Or7YlDLBUiilM-hn1-bVUj6ErIl9QbTX/s1600-h/zrf602+029.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="425" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjmAXIMhpyy_E_lJmwnYxpcC9NxTQu9G80vp6CLVCXOjuk8QbLasTkDfQzTNmUFVh2nE7CAsrB3oISyulpxbgzmHACglEb2WGKM8ZPHC5bNUGw2Or7YlDLBUiilM-hn1-bVUj6ErIl9QbTX/s640/zrf602+029.jpg" width="640" /></a><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">And these are the results from those positions , all at 1/800th sec !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Tamron 17-50mm lens at 50mm . </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQ4IfUGr4QK2cCVKaOzaiU7FOeQSxarljFfHboYaw9UANCz0FDgOSUweRJpmqbONIZjpulMaWiVIXp_xuTHgzA7-x-SKnD8v2C3EO5uWlZ_n4bHrtoo7DcaYHGFpsmyB9_UJfpTsG9jvEE/s1600-h/zrf602+030.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="425" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQ4IfUGr4QK2cCVKaOzaiU7FOeQSxarljFfHboYaw9UANCz0FDgOSUweRJpmqbONIZjpulMaWiVIXp_xuTHgzA7-x-SKnD8v2C3EO5uWlZ_n4bHrtoo7DcaYHGFpsmyB9_UJfpTsG9jvEE/s640/zrf602+030.jpg" width="640" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgENsIhDntrHorZ40ov_-K4cuyEsbcehOwovgHNBeK2-KOr0kyyq1xvifsjU4w3kXpLzUgryGFUrmmClgt7b89ordU5jDp72xZMFKtmqhdeKhjBlSdSzhOpRPK2qCWy1loGYoy8K1QNCShw/s1600-h/zrf602+031.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="425" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgENsIhDntrHorZ40ov_-K4cuyEsbcehOwovgHNBeK2-KOr0kyyq1xvifsjU4w3kXpLzUgryGFUrmmClgt7b89ordU5jDp72xZMFKtmqhdeKhjBlSdSzhOpRPK2qCWy1loGYoy8K1QNCShw/s640/zrf602+031.jpg" width="640" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8ezFWTg-ahZ5pm4m5-Qgx-gtpPtWqnBx8sVCiz9XF0bh2unBO22Gmi0uzWRfAzSW-2HjOsBqETSw9AbewI3_oxUfwK_J64lCjiHEYu7n09dT1yXxc62ZgXQNEUysH5l1-yggKxWK8Wt8g/s1600-h/zrf602+034.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="425" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8ezFWTg-ahZ5pm4m5-Qgx-gtpPtWqnBx8sVCiz9XF0bh2unBO22Gmi0uzWRfAzSW-2HjOsBqETSw9AbewI3_oxUfwK_J64lCjiHEYu7n09dT1yXxc62ZgXQNEUysH5l1-yggKxWK8Wt8g/s640/zrf602+034.jpg" width="640" /></a><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">I ran and took 96 large strides to get back so perhaps it is more than 100m</span> .</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;">As another test I took I went to the milking shed and placed the tripod with the flash on it behind a metal door and between two large metal tanks to make it as difficult as possible . The flash still fired ! I think that's covered every possibility that I could come up against at any distance I could need it to work at .</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgg_EcxLm4NsGszmD7X8nvvvJqRUcuXe5R8obO6fhOFr1bSkDSGV5wTTl9bITTquh7XNnQrsnx5kIAey5X0PDDGzuJS3YE15C7Hs8pf0WJFUOgGBLg6tff301qnXQ-W3ZNdCzLIb_hH_H3N/s1600-h/zrf602+035.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgg_EcxLm4NsGszmD7X8nvvvJqRUcuXe5R8obO6fhOFr1bSkDSGV5wTTl9bITTquh7XNnQrsnx5kIAey5X0PDDGzuJS3YE15C7Hs8pf0WJFUOgGBLg6tff301qnXQ-W3ZNdCzLIb_hH_H3N/s640/zrf602+035.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">As a side issue we were discussing the possibility of transmitting wireless TTL on <a href="http://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=260506">nikoncafe</a> . This has been done with the <a href="http://www.radiopopper.com/products/">radiopoppers</a> but we also spoke about the fact that the RF 602's wake up the SB800 flash from standby mode with a half press of the button but can't wake the SB600's and won't let the SB900's go into sleep mode so we did some measuring and this is what mike66 of nikoncafe came up with ....</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">" Here is what I found on the left rear contact of the speedlights. When active, each contact had a DC component with a negative going square wave pulse. When in standby, the contact was zero Volts.</span><br />
<blockquote><span style="font-size: large;">SB-900:<br />
3.75V DC with a negative pulse of 40mV. The pulse width is 8ms and the period is 130ms.<br />
SB-800:<br />
4.00V DC with a negative pulse of 100mV. The pulse width is 8ms and the period is 250ms.</span></blockquote><br />
<blockquote><span style="font-size: large;">SB-600:<br />
4.00V DC with a negative pulse of 80mV. The pulse width is 60ms and the period is 260ms.</span> <br />
<blockquote><span style="font-size: large;"> The SB-800 had another interesting surprise on the front right contact, which neither of the other speedlights shared. When the speedlight was active, this contact had a positive going square wave pulse train of 2.5V. The pulse width is 2.5ms and the period is 250ms. When the SB-800 went into standby, the voltage on this contact was zero with no pulse train. "</span></blockquote></blockquote><span style="font-size: large;">As we learn more about the RF 602 wireless flash triggers perhaps we will find a way to make them work properly with the SB600 and SB900 . Perhaps Yongnuo will just make the next product work properly ? They probably took a D200 and SB800 and reverse engineered the contacts thinking that it would work with any flash . For now anyway they are still a pretty powerful product considering what they can do compared to other cheaper flash triggers .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-1678359857939046212010-01-26T15:47:00.001-08:002010-04-24T20:40:27.657-07:00Realsynch flash<span style="font-size: large;">I'll state from the beginning : This will only work with a Nikon D40 , D50 or D70/S since they do not have a focal plane shutter , instead the sensor fires electronically which gives it the advantage of capturing the whole flash in one go as opposed to a slit moving across the frame as with Focal Plane [FP] shuters .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">First off two samples to whet your appetite comparing what I call "realsynch" to the high-FP trick mode that modern cameras use in bright sunshine with high shutter speeds .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This is the best a Nikon D90 and SB800 can do at a distance of 5 metres ....</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">taken indoors at night .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/?action=view&current=zD905m004.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" height="640" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/zD905m004.jpg" width="640" /></a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">And this is what "realsynch" does ....</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/?action=view&current=zD505m006.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" height="640" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/zD505m006.jpg" width="640" /></a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I used a modified SB24 flash for my "realsynch" flash . Because the cameras mentioned fire electronically with their sensors they have a 1/500th flash synch speed meaning that since the SB800 , for example , fires at full power for around 1/1000th of a second the camera will be able to capture that entire flash in 1/500th of a second without any overlap in the timing of the electronics .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">With a D90 this time is only 1/200th of a second and after that it changes to FP mode where the shutter slides across the frame in a slit - then it has to resort to a weak continuous light so the whole frame receives the same amount of light .... more on that later .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/DSC_0001text.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br />
</a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">First we have to make sure the D40/50/70/S we are using doesn't know there is a flash connected and there are two options , either slide a piece of paper under the two back pins as you slide the flash into the hotshoe or do what I did - open the base of the flash and cut the two wires to the back two pins -BUT : be careful of high voltages , you could get zapped !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Now if you have an SB600/800/900 the paper trick is the safest if you are not 100% sure of what you are doing , also you don't want to damage a newer flash .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">And this is a picture I took a while back to show the flash pins .</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/DSC_0001text.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="424" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/DSC_0001text.jpg" width="640" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/?action=view&current=zDSC_0001text.jpg" target="_blank"><br />
</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The centre pin gets earthed to the 'ground' contact on the side of the hotshoe when the camera wants it to fire . The single pin at the top is the 'camera to flash' communication pin .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The two at the bottom are for the flash to communicate with the camera so I disconnect them so the camera doesn't know the flash is connected and can't default to maximum synch speed .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">In any case it doesn't speak the same language as the newer cameras so I have found that with my D40 and D50 I can fit an older flash without bypassing or blocking any of the pins and it still works at any speed , however I can't guarantee that there won't be any mis-communication between the camera and flash so I generally use my SB24 with the wires cut ....</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I leave the one at the top connected because it is useful in that you can switch the SB24 to "standby " mode and when the camera is switched on that pin wakes the flash up - so the flash knows a camera is connected but the camera doesn't know a flash is connected !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Of course this means you have to input the aperture , iso and zoom of the head manually - but you can still leave the flash in 'auto' mode and it will use its sensor to control the flash output accordingly - based on the settings you have told it to use .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The advantage ? Well you can see that from the two pictures at the top !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">If we go by the 'sunny 16' rule : Bright sunlight at F16 gives you iso 200 and 1/200th max for the D90 . The SB800 tells me I have 2.7 metres working distance at this setting but when I open the aperture - F8 1/800th , F4 1/3200th ... the flash has to go to high fp mode and tells me I have 1.4 metres working distance .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Now the SB24 : F16 on the D50 allows me 1/500th sec at iso 500 , full power - which gives me 4 metres . f8 iso 200 1/800th full power is cutting it a bit fine to prevent overlap but as we drop in flash power it fires much faster . At 1/4 power it fires at 1/2700th sec and at 1/8 it fires at 1/5500th sec so at F4 1/3200th and iso 200 I can leave it on 1/4 and still catch a high percentage of the flash and have 4 metres working distance .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">These distances are at 24mm wide angle on the zoom head and increase [ on both flashes ] as I zoom in and the power used would be enough to light a subject in total darkness as shown by the first two pictures . Of course outside in bright sunlight we would not need all that power and could use the flash as fill only , bounce it off a reflector , or close the aperture without changing the settings on the flash thereby fooling the flash to think it doesn't need to fire so strong [ increasing the iso setting on the flash will also reduce its power ] .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Here are two more pictures illustrating the power you have outside in bright sunlight .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Just remember one thing though , you have so much power available you may need to make sure you don't get too close to your subject/s since the flash may not be able to fire weak enough !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/?action=view&current=zsynch005ist.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/zsynch005ist.jpg" width="640" /></a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/?action=view&current=zsynch006ist.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/zsynch006ist.jpg" width="640" /></a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Now the 'rough' maths . Due to the inverse square law when you are twice as far from the subject - the light from the flash going forward in a 'rectangular' pattern means that the length and breadth of that 'rectangle' double and twice the length times twice the breadth = 4 times the area . So if you are getting twice the working distance it actually means you have 4 times the flash power ! The results may not agree 100% with the maths but they look close enough to prove that there is a huge advantage in 'realsynch' compared to high-fp mode .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">So if the SB800 tells me I have 1.4 metres working distance and the SB24 tells me I have 4 metres then 4/1.4 = 2.85 X the working distance . 2.85 squared gives just over 8X the power !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">That's 3 stops more powerful than a D90 and SB800 combination achieved with a lowly D40 and SB24 flash !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">After doing some tests in manual mode without flash to get the same histograms as the first pictures [ not 100% but close ] it appears I am getting 2 1/3 to 2 2/3 stops more power than high fp mode .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I just did some calculations on the difference between normal flash and High fp on the SB800 , hopefully they are correct ;</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">When I set my camera manually to iso 200 , F16 and 1/200th sec the flash tells me I have 0.6-2.7 metres working distance available . As I take it to F8 1/800th or F4 1/3200th it goes into high-fp mode and tells me I have 0.6-1.4 metres . Now 2.7m/1.4m gives us 1.928X the distance . 1.928 squared tells us we have 3.72X the flash power when we are not in high-fp mode .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">1/3.72 = 0.2688 which is the power we have in fp mode compared to normal flash mode .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">That's less than 27% of normal flash power with a D90 and SB800 flash , when in high-fp mode .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">At iso 100 and 35mm the SB800 has a GN of 38m and the SB24 a GN of 36m . By my calculations the SB24 has less than 90% of the power of a SB800 .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">But when we start comparing "realsynch" to high fp mode the SB24/D40 combination has almost 8X more power at higher shutter speeds due to the faster flash synch speed !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Today I did some tests to try to turn "day into night " .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">First a picture without flash .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flashsynch/?action=view&current=zhomeflash031-1.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flashsynch/zhomeflash031-1.jpg" width="640" /></a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Under expose the background by increasing the shutter speed ...</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flashsynch/?action=view&current=zhomeflash033-1.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flashsynch/zhomeflash033-1.jpg" width="640" /></a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">And with the D40 , [35mm 1.8 lens] and SB 24 we still have enough power at 4 meters to make the picture look like a bad 'direct flash' shot at night !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flashsynch/?action=view&current=zhomeflash034-1.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flashsynch/zhomeflash034-1.jpg" width="640" /></a></span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-35599662696893709772010-01-26T15:46:00.001-08:002010-01-26T15:46:17.525-08:00Direct flash and TTL/BLRecently I was involved in a discussion regarding the advantage of distance info when using TTL/BL and direct flash .<br />
Anyway I decided to try to explain this in an uninterrupted logical manner for those who are interested in the subject .<br />
Ideally we avoid direct flash but there are times when we have no choice . Outdoors in daylight is a good example with nothing to bounce off and when we only want subtle fill-flash as well .<br />
First we need to understand how they meter :<br />
TTL doesn't care how well you have the ambient exposed , it simply tries to get an average grey in the centre of the frame ......<br />
<br />
<img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zTTL.jpg" /><br />
<br />
TTL/BL on the other hand is more complicated , when the flash head is pointing forward it meters quite heavily toward the distance info from the lens as well as using a different pattern to meter from , it uses the " focus point diamond '' and can select a smaller area from anywhere inside that pattern ......<br />
<br />
<img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zTTLBL.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
With direct flash though it only uses a small portion of the pre-flash reading from this pattern .<br />
On to the tests . First we have TTL/BL , I've underexposed the background in these pictures so we only have the flash lighting the scene .<br />
<br />
<img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zdirect001.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
<img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zdirect002.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
<br />
With the advantage of distance info TTL/BL does a pretty good job of maintaining a consistent exposure for the subject regardless of its size in the frame - now TTL flash .<br />
<br />
<img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zdirect003t.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
<img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zdirect004.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
As you can see TTL doesn't know the distance , all it knows is that it wants an average grey in the centre of the frame and to illustrate this I took both of these images and applied an 'average blur' in photoshop in the centre of the frame .....<br />
<br />
When the subject is central and fills a decent percentage of the centre of the frame it's not bad ....<br />
<br />
<img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zdirect003t.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
<img height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zdirect003.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
But when the subject is smaller and far from the background TTL has to make that small subject really bright to get and average grey in the centre of the frame , TTL/BL does not suffer from this weakness since it knows how far away the subject is [ with direct flash only ! ]<br />
<br />
<img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zdirect004.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
<img height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zdirect004c.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
Now we take a darker subject with a lighter background , some may say TTL flash looks better here ....<br />
<br />
<img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zdirect021.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
<img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zdirect022.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
<br />
In reality TTL has fired stronger because the subject does not fill the frame and is black so it's trying to make it an average grey . The result may be more pleasing to the eyes for some but essentially the problem is not with TTL/BL flash in this case . When you are using direct flash and want to light the subject correctly you can't expect the flash to light the background correctly as well as the subject and be accurate in both cases ,though , with TTL flash , there will be the odd occasion where the results will look good with the right combination of subject colour , size , and distance from the background which is pure luck .<br />
<br />
So the problem is not the 'car' but the 'nut that holds the steering wheel ' .<br />
If you are using direct flash you have to make sure you expose the ambient correctly - so that is what I have done , I adjusted the shutter speed to expose the background the way I wanted it and let the flash handle the subject - in this case TTL/BL senses that the ambient is having a greater effect on the subject and backs off accordingly .<br />
<br />
<img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zdirect023.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
TTL on the other hand still thinks it is the only light source and fires too strong causing more blown highlights .<br />
<br />
<img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/blog/zdirect024.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<br />
The conclusion of the matter ? If you are using direct flash with TTL/BL you are concentrating on the subject at a set distance and have to expose for the background with your normal camera settings , with direct flash and TTL on the other hand it all depends on how big your subject is in the centre of the frame , the subject colour , the background colour behind the subject in the centre of the frame that it meters from , the distance form the background that is having an effect on the metering .......<br />
I choose TTL/BL and the advantage of the distance info from the lens with direct flash .Choose whichever you want - just understand how it works . [ and shoot manual flash when possible :smile: ] .Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-17857449193717538512010-01-26T15:45:00.001-08:002010-01-26T15:45:04.329-08:00Motion sensor remote triggerThis is the prototype of my modification of a cheap dummy camera , with built in motor and motion sensor , to trigger my camera . <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YdXaHHBbPk">The video<br />
<br />
</a><br />
<a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Motion%20sensor/zyeah016-1.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Motion%20sensor/zyeah016-1.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 271px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><br />
<br />
First I started with a cheap [ $9 ] dummy security camera that moves from side to side when it detects motion to give people the impression that they are on video . It runs on 3 X AA 1.5 volt batteries which makes it 4.5 volts . { The motion sensor is pathetic so I am getting something better next week , but the same principle applies }<br />
Since the camera remote of my Nikon runs on a 3 volt battery I removed one battery and bridged out that connection in the battery holder making it effectively also a 3 volt system and it still works on that voltage - not that I'm promising that every one you buy will be able to do that :) !<br />
<br />
<a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Motion%20sensor/zyeah018-1.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Motion%20sensor/zyeah018-1.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 271px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><br />
Now this is obviously very rough as it involved a fair amount of trial and error and modifications , so you could do a better job now that you know how it goes - and I will do a better job when my more advanced motion sensor arrives , and I'll share the results with you as well :) .<br />
The basic concept is this : The dummy camera is always 'on' and when it detects motion it switches its power supply to the little motor inside which moves from side to side for about 25 seconds .<br />
By removing one battery and bridging out the contacts of that section of the compartment you are making it a 3 volt system - I'll explain the other option further down .<br />
You open the dummy camera , and cut the wires to the motor and take them to the battery feed of your camera remote !<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Motion%20sensor/zhack001.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Motion%20sensor/zhack001.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 272px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
In the meantime , if you want a neat job , you tape something around the remote , holding the button down [ I ended up taping some copper wire over the bare contacts after destroying the outer case of the remote :D ] ,and this means " you are always pushing the button " of the remote , and when the dummy camera supplies the power to it , it triggers the camera for about 25 seconds meaning you could have the camera in multi-shot mode or use the auto-focus option knowing it will have 25 seconds to get the auto focus right and take the shot[s] .<br />
Imagine a hawk on the side of the road eating some road-kill . You move the 'food' to a safer location , set up the camera and motion sensor and move away - and wait for the hawk to come back and trigger the camera a few times for some cool photos .<br />
<br />
If you are concerned that a motion sensor you are using may not work on 3 volts you could always do what auto electricians would tell you not to .... pick up an earth feed from between the batteries . The dummy camera I opened had a bunch of earth wires at one point and one of them went to the motor , along with the positive feed going to the motor . You could still use the positive feed and ignore the earth feed and instead take an 'earth' feed from behind the first battery in line , thereby using only two of the batteries for your supply to the remote .<br />
This is not exactly healthy for the batteries because the two batteries you are using will go flat before the one you are not using for your feed but this will take a very long time and batteries are cheap enough for the results you will get . You could also measure the batteries occasionally and 'rotate them ' , swapping them around regularly .<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Motion%20sensor/zhack002.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Motion%20sensor/zhack002.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 272px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a>I'll provide an update when my new door sensor arrives and hopefully will have something that works a little better in direct sunlight and has a better range .<br />
<br />
Now , how do you get to the battery contacts without destroying the outer cover ?!<br />
Here's a picture showing where the screws are located under the cover so you don't have to peel it off . There are three screws , this is looking from the top .....<br />
<br />
<a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Motion%20sensor/zhack003.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Motion%20sensor/zhack003.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 272px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a>Now you can just cut away a small section of the cover to get to the screws and open the remote and solder two wires to the battery supply - of course you don't re-fit your battery after doing this !<br />
Hopefully I will have an update on a superior model next week !<br />
.Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-47371863206974989762010-01-26T15:42:00.000-08:002010-05-05T11:51:24.775-07:00Sound activated flash trigger<span style="font-size: large;"><object height="385" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6LM2scWp1Gs&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6LM2scWp1Gs&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I have been asked to share my technique with regard to triggering a flash for 'special' pictures .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Here's the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LM2scWp1Gs">youtube video<br />
</a><img height="640" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/zzzlevel006.jpg" width="426" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/zzzazhertz029.jpg" width="640" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the basics :</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/iszflashtrigr001.jpg" width="640" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">To trigger a flash you simply need to join the centre pin to the side 'earth' contact which is basically what the 'test' button does on a flash . The 'pc' plug on the side of the flash has these two contacts . if your flash doesn't have a 'pc' plug you can always use a cheap hotshoe adapter to make the contact for you <img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/iszflashtrigr002.jpg" width="640" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">plug a 'pc' cord into it and take the two wires to the relay on the switching kit , connect them to pin 'com' and 'no' contacts of the relay [ 'common' and 'normally open' ] .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The picture is taken in a very dark room or at night outside , especially if you are shooting water balloons with an air rifle ! Set up the camera in manual mode, lowest iso , around F9 and two seconds exposure which gives a pitch black image if there is no additional light .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Take a few test images and adjust the distance of the flash to get correct exposure before you start destroying anything .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Then you need to trigger the flash , there are various ways to do this but in this case I bought a voice activated switch kit and modified it .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/iszflashtrigr003.jpg" width="640" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/iszflashtrigr004.jpg" width="640" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I also added a two metre length of wire to the mic so I could move it around .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">It would have still worked with the original relay but there would have been a slight delay when it pulls in - I added a solid state relay for instant switching and the first images were of a balloon with a hole in it that hadn't had time to split yet !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img height="640" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/zzzpop1010.jpg" width="425" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">What you need to do in a case like this is keep moving the mic further away so the sound has to travel further , until you catch the explosion at the right moment in time .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img height="640" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/zzzpop1005.jpg" width="426" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I set the camera up on a tripod [ D90 , 70-200VR lens , but any camera would do the job if it has a manual mode - even a compact ! ] , fill the balloon and place it on the table , trigger the camera with the remote and you have two seconds to fire !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The sound of the air rifle triggers the 'voice activated switch ' and the relay joins the two 'pc' wires together which fires the flash . the lowest power on an SB24 is 1/16th which fires at 1/11000th sec and for some shots I used the Sb800 at 1/128th power which gave me 1/41600th sec .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">That's the pellet behind the balloon , at 1/11000th sec .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/zzzcan021.jpg" width="640" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/zzztwoflashblns007.jpg" width="640" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Someone sugested I try safety goggles so I said "ok"</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/zzzcupop031.jpg" width="640" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">You could add food colouring</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/zzzcupop036.jpg" width="640" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">And of course not every country allows the use of air rifles and you don't all live on a farm like I do so you could just put the mic on a table and drop a glass of water or something to trigger the flash ...</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img height="426" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/zzzglassdrop015.jpg" width="640" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">These are just a few of the things I tried , you can photograph anything that makes a sound that will trigger the flash - how about setting your SB800 to 100hz repeating flash and dropping a golf ball .... it needs some work still but shows one of the many other possibilites for sound activated flash pictures !</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img height="425" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Other/zzzhertz017.jpg" width="640" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Friday 2 /10/2009 update .....................</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Also see <a href="http://desmond-downs.blogspot.com/2010/05/stop-motion-photography.html">"Stop motion photography" </a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/zbulbsmash019.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" height="133" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/high%20speed/zbulbsmash019.jpg" style="float: left; height: 272px; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 408px;" width="200" /></a></span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-91162159434972250172010-01-26T15:40:00.001-08:002010-07-04T01:11:58.447-07:00High-fp flash<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sxv5yic59Go&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sxv5yic59Go&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sxv5yic59Go"><br />
</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sxv5yic59Go"><br />
</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sxv5yic59Go"><br />
</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Nikon's manuals don't explain auto 'high'- fp very well - or the limitations involved .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Most cameras have a focal plane shutter</span><br />
<br />
{ Except the D1 , D40 , D50 and D70[S] , they have electronically switched sensor/shutters and can do what I call <a href="http://realsynch.blogspot.com/">'realsynch flash'</a> and effectively have 6X as much power with flash at maximum speed , compared to a pro body in high-fp mode } , but other cameras need high-fp mode .<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">At your camera's maximum synch speed [ 1/200th sec for the D90 ] the shutter opens , the flash fires , and the shutter closes , which means that the entire sensor gets the full flash .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Here's an older camera with a 1/90th sec synch speed ...</span><br />
<br />
<a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid008t.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid008t.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 271px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">As the shutter speed increases the " first curtain " of the shutter opens and the " second curtain " starts chasing it across the screen right after it starts moving which means that a slit slides across the screen . If the flash were to fire at a higher shutter speed than the maximum synch speed you will get a partially-lit photo .....</span><br />
<br />
<a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid011t.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid011t.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 271px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><span style="font-size: large;">As you can see in the above image the flash fired , it lasted about 1/10 000th sec and turned off - the slit was still in the beginning stages of its travels though and so only a slit has been lit , as the slit continues its journey with no light source the top of the image will be black .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The solution is for the flash to act as a ' continuous ' light , it fires rapidly in succession and may fire tens of thousands of times per second , and so is effectively a 'continuous ' light and behaves the same as the ambient with regard to the fact that shutter speed now controls the flash output as well as the ambient .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">It would look something like this in slow motion - as the slit slides across the frame the flash keeps firing .... bzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014f.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014f.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 271px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 271px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014a.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014a.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 271px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014b.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014b.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 271px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014c.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014c.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 271px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014d.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014d.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 271px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014e.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014e.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 271px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><br />
<a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014f.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/highfpvid014f.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 271px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a><span style="font-size: large;">This is an old Canon camera so it is not exactly what the Nikon shutter would look like but it conveys the general idea . The main trade-off being that a lot of light is being wasted on the back of the partially open shutter .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">To do the maths you simply need to put your SB800 on the camera and assume 'sunny 16' rule - for the brightest clearest day you could have - at iso 200 and 1/200th you would be at F16 - set it to that , it's a " worst case scenario ' for outdoor flash .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Now have a look at the working distance shown on the back of the flash with the flash head facing forward , we have :</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">1.) 18mm 8.8 feet .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">2.) 35mm 11 feet .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">3.) 105mm 17 feet .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Now when we keep the ambient exposure where it is we can assume that changing to F8 will let in 4 X as much light so we would have to go to 1/800th sec shutter speed which is high-fp mode .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This gives us :</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">1.) 18mm 4.6 feet</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">2.) 35mm 5.8 feet</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">3.) 105mm 8.8 feet .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The calculations :</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">1.) 4.6/8.8 = 0.522 X the distance .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">2.) 5.8/11 = 0.527 X the distance .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">3.) 8.8/17 = 0.517 X the distance .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">So that means that we have just over half the working distance in each situation when we keep the ambient exposure where it is . To confirm this we can go to F4 , let in 4 X as much light , and to keep the ambient where it is we will have to go to 1/3200th sec effectively cutting that 4 X as much light in 1/4 again and negating the " advantage ' of opening the aperture .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">So now the flash is behaving the same as continuous light and whatever we do , keeping the ambient correctly exposed , we will have that same working distance .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Because of the 'inverse square law' [ 2 X the distance needs 4 X the power , while 1/2 the distance only needs 1/4 the power ] .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/ani20.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/ani20.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 272px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 408px;" /></a>When the subject is twice as far the lengths of the sides doubles , 2 X 2 = 4 X the area .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">And of course halving the distance means you will only need 1/4 the power .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Once again it's not all that simple . The distances shown are with regard to the flash having to light the entire scene , something we don't need when we have the ambient correctly exposed .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">A common setting for those who use 'fill-flash' outdoors is TTL-1.7 compensation , just to add some light to the subject without overpowering it with flash .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">TTL flash doesn't know how well you have the ambient exposed and negative compensation will need to be dialed in . TTL/BL on the other hand takes the ambient exposure into account and if it detects correct exposure it will automatically dial itself back to the equivalent of TTL-1.7 in situations where they meter equally .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Many people will dial in even more negative compensation so if you had to assume an 'average' of -2 EV for the flash compensation that is two stops , or 1/4 the power that you are 'demanding' of the flash anyway so it will be able to do that at the first distance suggested by the flash head before you changed to high-fp mode .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">If you were in TTL mode and went to high-fp , at105mm , and shot a subject 17 feet away [ when the flash head tells you that your limit is 8.8 feet ] the flash head will probably register -2 after firing telling you it never had enough power .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">But if you have dialed in '-2' on the flash head it will be happy to light a subject 17 feet away because it can do that at '-2' :) .</span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-74051986684894425912010-01-26T15:39:00.001-08:002010-09-23T00:15:36.704-07:00Wireless flash tests<span style="font-size: large;">I'm in the early stages of doing tests with Nikon's wireless flash system . [ I am making deductions from tests , I have no other knowledge besides the results I see , if I make a mistake feel free to point it out and we can work it out together ]</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Much of what I know is derived from my tests with TTL/BL and the realization that Nikon wireless meters the same as TTL/BL mode . The basic concept I have gathered so far is this : While TTL flash simply fires what it thinks is necessary to light the subject at a given aperture and iso REGARDLESS of the ambient lighting , TTL/BL [ and wireless ] takes the ambient into account and has the ability to add and subtract flash readings taken from individual focus points .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">After reading varying opinions on whether using separate channels adds to the exposure or not I decided to do some tests . These are the first three pictures I have taken and they tell me a lot already .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I used a black background so my subject was the lightest object in the frame and exposure would be calculated according to the brightest focus point reading as derived from my previous tests with TTL/BL .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">First a picture with one flash at left ....</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zwireless002.jpg" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Then we add another flash on channel 3a as well .....</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">[EDIT: it may look brighter because more of the face is lit up due to the second flash being closer to the camera]</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zwireless001-1.jpg" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">You can see the other flash was closer to the camera as the area above Stinky's left eye is lit up now .... but only half as much as the rest of the face lit by flash - because both flashes fired at half the power of the original exposure .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Then we change one flash to channel 3b - the camera still calculates exposure by adding ambient plus the reading from the other channel[s] and gives similar [ slightly brighter ?] exposure .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zwireless003.jpg" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I'll do some more tests but I'm already pretty sure that the exposure will stay consistent regardless of what channel the flashes are on .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The only reason I could think of for putting flashes on different channels is that you could then set different exposure compensation for the various channels without walking up to individual flash heads to do this .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Then I made the background white - knowing that Nikon's wireless flash defaults to TTL/BL mode I knew that it would meter for the brightest object under a focus point which would be white and would underexpose . The second shot was at +1.3 compensation to counteract this effect .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zwireless005.jpg" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zwireless006.jpg" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">QUOTE from another member :</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I've been following some of the posts which basically seem to say, "Group A is set by Nikon to under expose so that if and when you add a flash in group B, the additional light won't be too over exposed since the AWL/CLS system is too stupid to take into account lighting from two (or three) groups."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">My reply :</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Whoever says that is making a false assumption because they don't understand how TTL/BL meters . As I've shown in my "TTL/BL consistency theory"it meters for the brightest object under a focus point , which is why it underexposes when there is white in the frame . As shown by my recent tests the exposure comes out the same no matter how many channels [ groups ] you have . The fact that TTL/BL has the ability to take ambient into account makes it easy enough to understand that if it can say "x = f-a " [ where "x" = final output , "f " = pre-flash reading and "a" = ambient , in my made up equation ] , it can go a step further and calculate "x = [f1+f2]/2 -a " where "f1" and "f2" are group 3a and 3b pre-flash readings .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">It's probably not that simple but basically what I am saying is that if it can take ambient into account , it can take pre-flash readings from different groups into account as well and do the maths .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Tonight I separated the subjects to ensure no interference between pre-flash readings .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">First though , I did a few 'normal' shots ..... adding a white object under a focus point causes underexposure again .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zgroups006.jpg" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zgroups007.jpg" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Here we have two flashes on the same channel/group metering off the brightest focus point and adjusting accordingly . The controller doesn't know how many flashes are in each group - it only knows to make sure that the brightest focus point does not overexpose which means underexposure when white is in the frame - as it aims for a neutral gray .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zgroups008.jpg" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">If I move both flashes to the left the exposure is correct for that side - the white paper hasn't interfered with the exposure and the combined output from both flashes is the same as for one flash on that side with no white in the frame .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zgroups010.jpg" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Now if I put the flashes on separate groups and their pre-flash readings can't interfere with each other then the left channel puts out the right amount of flash for Stinky while the right channel underexposes due to the white brochure in the frame . They have each metered for the brightest focus point that they registered on their individual pre-flashes and adjusted accordingly .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zgroups009.jpg" /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I can see a lot of confusion resulting from using different groups without knowing exactly how they will meter . I can also see advantages in using different groups in situations that would call for separate metering in a complicated composition .</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">For the moment I can see the simplest approach being to use one group no matter how many flashes you are using , and setting compensation on the camera body for the brightest object under a focus point . Any other adjustments for varying degrees of output from different sides could be set on the flash heads themselves .</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Also have a look at <a href="http://dptnt.com/2009/11/nikon-cls-advanced-wireless-lighting-part-i/#comment-1161">these interesting tests </a>. </span>Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-5359802962573156872010-01-26T15:38:00.001-08:002010-02-21T15:34:12.679-08:00Consistency theoryThe main ''weakness'' with TTL/BL is that it tends to under-expose when using straight up bounce flash . But as mentioned before there is a 'consistency' to this weakness that can be exploited . It under-exposes because it is exposing for the brightest object within the focus point diamond for some reason . This is not a problem when there is a black background but causes severe under-exposure with white in the frame . When spot metering off a white subject you would normally add +1.3 EV compensation to make it 'white' without blowing any details .<br />
I've used this same compensation in my examples .<br />
One instance where this 'weakness' can be used to advantage is when there is a consistent light coloured background - for example at a craft fair or art fair where everything is mounted on the same white wall or in white cubicles . If the ceiling is low enough to bounce off you only need to make one compensation adjustment for that background and be sure that at least one focus point is on the background in each picture .<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zconsistency009.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zconsistency009.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
In this case +1.3 dialed in to the flash head did the job .<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zconsistency011.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zconsistency011.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Then each picture with the same colour wall in the background shows a consistent histogram on the right , the position of that right portion is in almost exactly the same place regardless of a bright subject or a dark subject .<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zconsistency025.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zconsistency025.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zconsistency026.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zconsistency026.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zconsistency018.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zconsistency018.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zconsistency017.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zconsistency017.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Now compare this to TTL flash - look how the right hand side of the histogram is all over the place . Not that you couldn't set TTL to +1.3 and use FV-lock off the wall to get the same consistency - just make sure you understand how each system works and know beforehand what results you will get and why- then you can choose for yourself what you want to use .<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zconsistency021.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zconsistency021.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zconsistency023.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zconsistency023.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zconsistency024.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zconsistency024.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zconsistency019.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zconsistency019.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zconsistency020.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zconsistency020.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Since TTL uses the centre of the frame and the 'matrix' pattern which I selected [ Centre weighted would have given similar results ] I suppose you could say it could be 'predicted' and adjusted accordingly but it would involve a lot of skill to know what settings to use in such a variety of situations - with an equally large variety of compensation adjustments .<br />
It is good to know that the 'weakness' of TTL/BL can be used to advantage because of its predictability but you would think Nikon could have done better .<br />
I need to do more tests with the diffuser dome - I am getting some interesting results with iDesmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-59947711745163013242010-01-26T15:37:00.000-08:002010-01-26T15:37:06.875-08:00Sb400On the main page I've discussed how TTL/BL works differently to TTL by also using the focus points to meter from . It is not foolproof though , it has it's weaknesses . The main one being bounce flash in the presence of white subjects - or white in the frame .<br />
With a fairly neutral subject it is similar to TTL .<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zBL400001.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zBL400001.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zBL400002.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zBL400002.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Even when we move further back things look ok .....<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zBL400004.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zBL400004.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Then we introduce something white in line with one of the focus points .....<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zBL400003.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zBL400003.jpg" /></a><br />
and it almsot behaves like spot metering looking for the brightest part of the frame and under exposes . +1 flash compensation recovers this loss of exposure but it is a nuisance to have to do this . Actually it should probably be +1.3 stops to get the white's ''white'' .<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zBL400005.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zBL400005.jpg" /></a><br />
There is good news though , it is consistent in its underexposure unlike TTL metering . We can attain TTL metering by having the camera in manual mode and changing to spot metering , then the SB400 reverts to TTL metering if that is what you are familiar with and prefer to use .<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zBL400009.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zBL400009.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
I would say you need to make a decision between using the SB400 in manual and spot metering to get TTL flash along with FV-lock OR use it in normal matrix or centre weighted metering and set one compensation value for any picture with at least one focus point on a white subject .<br />
To show you what I mean the next three pictures are what TTL flash does with a subject that is not always central , and with varying colour backgrounds- or subjects for that matter .<br />
The right side of the histogram is all over the place ....<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zBL400exp001.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zBL400exp001.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zBL400exp002.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zBL400exp002.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zBL400exp004.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zBL400exp004.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Now compare the erratic metering of the above pictures to the consistency of TTL/BL+1 .<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zBL400exp006.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zBL400exp006.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zBL400exp009.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zBL400exp009.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zBL400exp010.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zBL400exp010.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
See how all the histograms in TTL/BL+1 are in the same line ! As long as at least one focus point was on that white background the exposure stayed in the same place !<br />
The D90 only allows +1 flash compensation but I can get more by dialing it in to normal EV compensation - it is cumulative , if I dial in +1 flash compensation and +0.7 EV compensation I will actually have +1.7 flash compensation .<br />
I find this to be the biggest weakness with TTL/BL . It means either resorting to spot metering for normal TTL flash or watching what is in the frame carefully .<br />
The consolation is that if you know there will be a light coloured object somewhere in the frame all the time that one exposure compensation will fix it with consistent results as long as at least one focus point is on that light coloured object .<br />
No flash mode is perfect which is why it is good to learn how they behave - especially if you have an SB400 which only does TTL/BL unless you resort to spot metering !Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7826929655032307558.post-1347884763154537872010-01-26T15:34:00.001-08:002010-01-26T15:34:23.957-08:00Focus point summaryMore on the 'focus point' ' concept :<br />
The D40 with its three focus points makes it easier to illustrate . These pictures were taken without flash and the focus point was selected manually in " Dynamic Area " focus mode where the user moves the focus point to the subject . This can give confusing results the first time until you learn what is happening .<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zmetering008.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zmetering008.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
With the centre focus point selected it behaves like the 'old' matrix metering and normal TTL flash by over-reacting to the black in the centre of the frame .<br />
Then I moved the focus point onto the subject for completely different results ......<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zmetering007.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zmetering007.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
All of a sudden it is behaving like TTL/BL flash [ remember there was no flash used here , this is just to illustrate the 'focus point' concept ] , it is doing a much better job of exposing for the subject regardless of the centre of the frame .<br />
<br />
Again , here is a comparison between ''normal'' matrix metering and TTL flash .....<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zmetering008.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zmetering008.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zextremebl001.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zextremebl001.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
And then again with the focus point moved to the subject compared to TTL/BL flash .<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zmetering007.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zmetering007.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zextremebl002.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zextremebl002.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
The similarity is that TTL/BL automatically metered off the brightest part of the frame even though I had the centre focus point selected in that last shot , but you can still get varied results without flash depending on which is the active focus point which is what annoys many people about the metering on the newer Nikons .<br />
Basically this means that when you are not using flash results can vary quite greatly depending on where your focus point is . When you are using flash TTL will meter strongly for the centre of the frame while TTL/BL will automatically meter off the brightest object under the focus point diamond regardless of which focus point you have selected .<br />
<br />
Today I did some outdoor tests in bright sunlight to test the focus point theory in a real-life situation . When the subject is mostly front lit the focus points are picking up a lot of light and backing off the flash . here is an extreme example of what could happen .<br />
We introduce a bright white object to the bottom focus point and the flash backs right off ....<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zbltests019.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zbltests019.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zbltests020.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zbltests020.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
I suppose this is a real-life possibility , we have a subject with a strip of white under three focus points and the flash backs off in response . We replace that with a darker strip which is no longer the brightest object under the focus points and it takes the next brightest object - the face in this example , and gives what it considers the right amount of flash .....<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zbltests011.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zbltests011.jpg" /></a><br />
<a href="http://s107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/?action=view&current=zbltests012.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m300/dvdowns/Flash/zbltests012.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
As I've learned more , and of course considering the D40 only has the three focus points in the centre , but reacts to objects near the top of the frame , it has become more obvious that TTL/BL uses the entire 'focus point diamond' and has the ability to select an area based on colour to meter off . This sound very much like Nikons " 3D colour matrix metering " concept in that it can decide , based on colour , what to meter off within the important area that you normally find the focus points in .<br />
<br />
.Desmond Downshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13628907753894628059noreply@blogger.com0